been getting a lot of this lately, what do you guys think?

Rod Martin · Post by **Rod Martin** » Tue Oct 09, 2012 9:27 am

ON JANUARY 1, 2013, THE US GOVERNMENT WILL BE REQUIRING EVERYONE TO HAVE DIRECT DEPOSIT FOR SS CHECKS.

WONDER WHY?

Subject: HR 4646

Be sure to read entire explanation

Watch for this AFTER November elections; remember this BEFORE you VOTE, in case you think Obama is looking out for your best interest.

A 1% tax on all bank transactions is what HR 4646 calls for.

Do you receive a paycheck, or a retirement check from Social Security or a pension fund and have it direct deposit??

Well guess what ... It looks as if the Obama administration wants to tax it 1% !!!

This bill was put forth by Rep. Chaka Fattah (D-PA).

YES, that is 1% tax on all bank transactions - HR 4646, every time it goes in and every time money goes out.

Ask your congressperson to vote NO.

FORWARD THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW!

1% tax on all bank transactions ~ HR 4646 - ANOTHER NEW OBAMA TAX SLIPPED IN WHILE WE WERE ASLEEP. Checked this on snopes, it's true! Check it out yourself ~ HR 4646.

President Obama's finance team is recommending a one percent (1%) transaction fee (TAX). His plan is to sneak it in after the November elections to keep it under the radar.

This is a 1% tax on all transactions at any financial institution - banks, credit unions, savings and loans, etc. Any deposit you make, or even a transfer within your own bank from one account to another, will have a 1% tax charged.

If your paycheck or your Social Security or whatever is direct deposit, it will get a 1% tax charged for the transaction.

If your paycheck is $1000, then you will pay the government $10 just for the privilege of depositing your paycheck in your bank. Even if you hand carry your paycheck or any check in to your bank for a deposit, 1% tax will be charged.

You receive a $5,000 stock dividend from your broker, the government takes $50 just to allow you to deposit that check in the bank.

If you take $1,000 cash to deposit at your bank, 1% tax will be charged.

Mind you, this is from the man who promised that, if you make under $250,000 per year, you will not see one penny of new tax.

Keep your eyes and ears open, you will be amazed at what you learn about this guy's under-the-table moves to increase the number of ways you are taxed.

Oh, and by the way, if you receive a refund from the IRS next year and you have it direct deposited or you walk in to deposit that check, you guessed it. You will pay a 1% charge of that money just for putting it in your bank.

Remember, any money, cash, check or whatever, no matter where it came from, you will pay a 1% fee if you put it in the bank.

Some will say, oh well, it's just 1%. Are you kidding me? It's a 1% tax increase across the board. Remember, once the tax is there, they can also raise it at will. And if anyone protests, they will just say, "Oh,that's not really a tax, it's a user fee"!

Think this is no big deal? Go back and look at the transactions you made from last year's banking statements. Then add the total of all those transactions and deduct 1%. Still think it's no big deal?

The following is copied from Snopes:

1. snopes.com: Debt Free America Act â¤¢â¤¢â¤¢

Is the U.S.government proposing a 1% tax on debit card usage and/or banking transactions?

...It is true. The bill is HR - 4646 introduced by US Rep Peter deFazio D-Oregon and US Senator Tom Harkin D-Iowa. Their plan is to sneak it in after the...

...moved beyond proposing studies and submitted the Debt Free America Act (H.R. 4646 ), a bill calling for the implementation of a scheme to pay down the...

...[2010] by Rep. Chaka Fattah (D-Pa.). His "Debt Free America Act" (H.R. 4646 ) would impose a 1 percent "transaction tax" on every financial transaction...

Wed, 02 Nov 201111:27:37 GMThttp:// http://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/debtfree.asp

Also,Some are talking about a UN tax thru a treaty with UN. That would inpose taxes on the world,all UN members to fund stuff for poor countries ?

I have been to busy working to really pay attenion

Kelly Ripa · Post by **Kelly Ripa** » Tue Oct 09, 2012 8:36 pm

nice I assume this is going to be reported on by the three major news groups tomorrow. If true, it is the undoing of the present ring knocking Goldman Sachs administration and a clear path to those who are going to vote...Those of you who don't are useless spineless windbags

Grumpy · Post by **Grumpy** » Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:46 am

From what I can find out the original bill HR 4646 was killed in committee, later re introduced as HR 1125. Same minority congressman keeps bringing it up but from what I read has no support and 0 chance of going anywhere. Snopes even has it on their site.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/debtfree.asp

Rod Martin · Post by **Rod Martin** » Wed Oct 10, 2012 6:47 am

What about taxes thru the UN? Has anybody heard anything like that?

Grumpy · Post by **Grumpy** » Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:22 am

Rod Martin wrote:What about taxes thru the UN? Has anybody heard anything like that?

Again, its some Democrats going along with this crap. Two Dems have actually sponsored a bill for the UN transaction tax you are talking about, DeFazio from Oregon and Tom Harkin from Iowa, both leftie wackos. But the UN is also pressing for a couple other taxes with support from some Democrats, a carbon tax, a billionaires tax and one other. GOP are firmly against it. If Obama and the Dems would have had full control of Congress for these last two years this stuff would have no doubt already been imposed, fits right in with Obama's ideology and plans. That steaming pile of excrement has to go.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... infringe-/

Skeeterman · Post by **Skeeterman** » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:57 am

The main reason why SS is going direct deposit is to save money.The money they will save will be from no more postal they would have to pay, paper they had to buy and all the machianary they do not have to up keep or buy.So this will save tax payers millions of dollars when they do this.