‘He’s a DREAMer. Release Him’

Thunnus Salmoides · Post by **Thunnus Salmoides** » Mon Jul 30, 2012 10:36 am

I find this a bit disturbing.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/hes-a-d ... /#comments

Seeking the truth about President Obama’s recent executive order dictating that the DREAM Act by implemented by fiat, Senator Jeff Sessions lent his microphone to two different individuals today, both of whom would know something about the issue. What they had to say was not particularly encouraging.

Sessions introduced his two guests as Chris Crane, President of the National Immigration and Customs Enforcement Council, which is the union that represents immigration and customs enforcement agents, and George McCubbin, President of National Border Patrol Council, which represents 17,000 border patrol agents and support staff.

Crane was the first to speak.

“It‘s impossible to understand the full scope of the administration’s changes, but what we are seeing so far concerns us greatly,” Crane said.

As an example of what might be causing this concern, Crane cited the issue of prosecutorial discretion for what he called “DREAMers,” IE illegal immigrants covered by President Obama’s new executive order. According to Crane’s description, the order has effectively allowed prosecutors to treat these individuals as not only immune to immigration law, but immune to practically all law. Moreover, any illegal immigrant can simply claim to have a GED, or be enrolled in high school, and the law will be applied to them with no questions asked.

“There is no burden for the alien to prove anything,” Crane said.
As to the lawlessness charge, Crane brought up a story of an illegal immigrant who was arrested on four different charges, several of which were felonies, and only one of which was related to his immigration status. Yet the reaction from prosecutors was to let the immigrant in question walk out without the least trace of concern.

“He’s a DREAMer. Release him,” Crane remarked bitterly to summarize the response of prosecutors.

McCubbin, for his part, accused Homeland Secretary Janet Napolitano of painting an unrealistically rosy picture of her record on immigration, while simultaneously surrounding herself with “Yes” men.

“When you surround yourself with people who always say ‘yes,’ you will get the answer you want,” McCubbin said.

```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````

Anyone want to try to defend this policy?

Grumpy · Post by **Grumpy** » Mon Jul 30, 2012 2:52 pm

Obama makes Nixon look like a choir boy and Jimmy Carter look like a genius. Its a steady incessant stream of bologna coming from the white house and federal govt. the likes this nation has never seen. Romney and the GOP would have to try real hard to lose this election, otherwise the news begins to get better for the country shortly.

Heres more
http://washingtonexaminer.com/federal-c ... le/2503500

Marty · Post by **Marty** » Mon Jul 30, 2012 9:48 pm

If the citizens of this Country still took the Constitution seriously, Obama would be impeached for his decision to unilaterally grant amnesty to certain illegal aliens.

Article 1, Sec. 8 of the Constitution, which enumerates the power of Congress, states that "Congress shall have the Power To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization." Congress has passed numerous laws pertaining to immigration and naturalization, including laws requiring the deportation of illegals.

The role of the President, according to Article II, Sec. 3, is to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." Obama's refusal to execute Congress's immigration laws (or, for that matter, Congress's Defense of Marriage Act) is an impeachable offense. Article II, Sec. 4 states that the President "shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for... Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors." The deliberate failure to enforce valid immigration law and allow hordes of foreigners to live and work in the U.S. is, arguably, "treason," and doing so in an election year to appease Hispanic voters could certainly be considered "bribery."

Grumpy · Post by **Grumpy** » Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:53 pm

And it keeps on coming .... http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... ex-crimes/

I am really beginning to believe the idiot in the white house is flat out dangerous, he is either incredibly stupid or hell bent on changing the country into something a lot of people have died to keep from happening.

Grumpy · Post by **Grumpy** » Thu Aug 02, 2012 10:57 am

Democrats want another group of illegal immigrants to have some immunity from deportation, this time its "gay" illegal immigrants. Can't make this stuff up.
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/24172 ... portations