We’re fishing exactly the wrong fish, scientists warn

Post Reply
WB Staff
Posts: 12604
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 10:56 am

We’re fishing exactly the wrong fish, scientists warn

Post by WB Staff »

...This research won’t come as a surprise to any field biologists who work with fish. Mark Wuenschel, who works at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Northeast Fisheries Science Center and was not a part of this study, said the size effect was so well known it has an acronym among researchers: BOFFFF, for Big Old Fat Fecund Female Fish. But this work is valuable because a BOFFFF's importance is often tough to assess, Wuenschel said — because these fish are fished out of the population.


In 2017, another team of scientists showed that the fishing industry catches the oldest fish at rates higher than the rest of the population. “You don't even need to be overfishing to get those big old fish to go down,” said Trevor Branch, a University of Washington professor and an author of the 2017 report, who was not involved with the new study.

The authors of the new research say it contains an important message for the fishing industry. “Most classic fisheries models don’t account for the massively disproportionate contribution that larger fish make, yet these are the first individuals to disappear under even a moderate fishing pressure,” Barneche and Marshall wrote in a joint email. “So, fisheries scientists, despite the best of intentions, have been using models that inadvertently recommend overharvesting.”

Barneche, Marshall and their colleagues used the example of cod, a commercially important fish. Picture a large Atlantic codfish: Her scales glisten and her chin whiskers are long. Her 30-kilogram body (66 pounds) is swollen with eggs. Nearby is a school of her little sisters and cousins. They are pregnant, too. But they are smaller, just 2 kilograms each.


When the big fish spawns, her eggs will outnumber the eggs deposited by 28 small fish, the authors of the new study calculated. Put another way, it takes more than 123 pounds of small cod to lay the same number of eggs spawned by one 66-pound fish.

“It’s simple physics,” said the University of British Columbia’s Tony Pitcher, a fisheries scientist not involved with this study. The longer a fish is, the greater the volume of her ovaries (proportional to her length). Bigger ovaries mean more eggs. That’s been very well known for more than a century, Pitcher said.

Less well known, he said, was the corresponding increase in egg quality. Older females do not simply lay more eggs. Their eggs are richer in fat and bigger in size. Based on the “total energy content” of fish eggs — the number, volume and nutrients — a 66-pound mother of cod is equal to even more fish. Not 28, but 37 little cod, per the new study. “All else being equal, more and better eggs means more fish,” Marshall said.

If an animal's limb or organ grows out of proportion with the rest of its body, scientists call that allometry. These fish eggs are an extreme example, or “hyperallometry.” Fish biologists “have been advocating for this idea for a long time,” Barneche and Marshal said in their email, “but our contribution was to show that hyperallometry is the rule, not the exception.”...

Read it all: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/spe ... 5b93d9ec56
Attachments
3J4MHKLQA45ATDRHLCI6A3OHR4.jpg
F242ME4CUIYXHOFNGJ6DOILZFU.jpg
Post Reply