Page 1 of 1

Seaguar AbrazX vs. INVIZX

Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:04 pm
by bigjosh15
I really like Seaguar's Fluorocarbon, but Im stuck on the Difference between AbrazX and INVIZX, and which one is better. Just looking for your 2 cents.

Thanks

Josh

Re: Seaguar AbrazX vs. INVIZX

Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:31 am
by obsessed fisherman
I've had real good performance from AbrazX. Therefore, never used InvizX. AbrazX does not seem to break as easy as some of the other flourcarbons I've used. May be that I have been getting better at knots and hook sets. I highly recommend AbrazX.
Jim

Re: Seaguar AbrazX vs. INVIZX

Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:17 am
by Luc Drouin
Both are good lines. I usually use the InvizX in smaller diameters 6 to 12LB test. If getting into heavy cover fishing 15Lb or more the AbrazX is more stiff which will help out. AbrazX has better "abrasion resistance". The InvizX is a little more sensative and soft which will help on casting. Both are stong and work well. Toss a spool of each on 2 different setups and see what you like.

Re: Seaguar AbrazX vs. INVIZX

Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 8:25 am
by fishing&fords
I use them both and don't see much of a difference , there both great performers

Re: Seaguar AbrazX vs. INVIZX

Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 9:02 am
by zaldain
Both great lines!

Abrazx- Awesome for short line flipping and pitching cover and slicing through delta elodea. Love the 25lb test.

Invisx- Very pliable and excellent on spinning reels. Prolly the best all around affordable 100% fluorocarbon you'll find in your local shop. I use this line 80% of the time.

If you want to spend a little extra coin and get the best of both worlds, go with the new TATSU. I call it "Tournament Line", only spooled before game day - Super soft, strong, invisible and lasts longer than comparable fluorocarbons. I'll put this stuff against any other line manufactured over seas!

Read more here: http://www.seaguar.com/products/tatsu.htm

Good luck!
Z