Which lake will it be next week? Any wagers?

65 fter from the delta to tahoe... that was a crazy tow up hyw 50 for sure and someone didn't think to look at the boat before moving...jeeze !CrankyOne wrote: ↑Sun Jun 01, 2025 11:15 am https://yubanet.com/regional/lake-tahoe ... n-mussels/
Which lake will it be next week? Any wagers?![]()
They are obviously more prevalent in the Delta than many of us would have hoped.MGJR wrote: ↑Mon Jun 02, 2025 1:09 pm Anyone believing all these headlines is as gullible as they come. In each instance, Berryessa, Oroville, Tahoe- a boat, which had to have been moored for a prolonged period, in an infected area, sufficient to build up a population of fully grown adult mussels, just so happened to pack up, and head to another reservoir and launch the same day. The statistical improbability is unquestionable for it to happen once, maybe even twice; but this may times under the circumstances is fishy at best. Mark my word - they will lock everything down, institute expensive tags, inspections and decontaminations. Do you think they are doing anything to the ships/persons bringing these into the state in the first place? Nope - you get to pay.
Gullible. How about educated and informed? I have a degree in aquatic ecology, worked for nearly two decades as a biologist for state, federal and private institutions. I would venture to guess that you haven't read any of the "literature" you are referring to. If you had, you would understand that the results of that particular paper are highly interpolated and projected based simply on species' tolerances and traits, not on actual wide scale occurrences. Furthermore - a single instance does not simply mean it's applicable everywhere. Yes...the Delta provides an outstanding breeding ground for this particular species - however, that does not mean the entire state does. Nor does it acknowledge the source, again, not addressed. Furthermore, the source should be quarantined. This entire state is hydrologically connected - anything downstream of the California Delta is basically now contaminated. In summation, I agree that there needs to be some action taken; however, I disagree with the approach and foresee years of added costs, despite no real benefit or resolution.Kennortonjr wrote: ↑Tue Jun 03, 2025 5:06 amThey are obviously more prevalent in the Delta than many of us would have hoped.MGJR wrote: ↑Mon Jun 02, 2025 1:09 pm Anyone believing all these headlines is as gullible as they come. In each instance, Berryessa, Oroville, Tahoe- a boat, which had to have been moored for a prolonged period, in an infected area, sufficient to build up a population of fully grown adult mussels, just so happened to pack up, and head to another reservoir and launch the same day. The statistical improbability is unquestionable for it to happen once, maybe even twice; but this may times under the circumstances is fishy at best. Mark my word - they will lock everything down, institute expensive tags, inspections and decontaminations. Do you think they are doing anything to the ships/persons bringing these into the state in the first place? Nope - you get to pay.
It’s funny, I have found in my everyday dealings in life that those prone to “conspiracies” are generally more gullible people….So are all the workers at these inspection stations in on this conspiracy?
I would encourage you to read some of the very insightful links that have been shared in other threads; specifically how this mussel has spread in South America. This is literally how it happens, it’s so crazy to watch people deny it in real time.
Appeal to authority fallacy. And what of the majority of biologists who would likely disagree with your stance? To that point, I'm still not sure what your stance is....? Originally you were implying that the state (presumably) was planting "false flag" boats at inspection sites? Now you say that some action should be taken? It's incredibly easy to sit back and criticize. Could you imagine a government that chose to do nothing? What would John Locke say about that?MGJR wrote: ↑Tue Jun 03, 2025 8:14 amGullible. How about educated and informed? I have a degree in aquatic ecology, worked for nearly two decades as a biologist for state, federal and private institutions. I would venture to guess that you haven't read any of the "literature" you are referring to. If you had, you would understand that the results of that particular paper are highly interpolated and projected based simply on species' tolerances and traits, not on actual wide scale occurrences. Furthermore - a single instance does not simply mean it's applicable everywhere. Yes...the Delta provides an outstanding breeding ground for this particular species - however, that does not mean the entire state does. Nor does it acknowledge the source, again, not addressed. Furthermore, the source should be quarantined. This entire state is hydrologically connected - anything downstream of the California Delta is basically now contaminated. In summation, I agree that there needs to be some action taken; however, I disagree with the approach and foresee years of added costs, despite no real benefit or resolution.Kennortonjr wrote: ↑Tue Jun 03, 2025 5:06 amThey are obviously more prevalent in the Delta than many of us would have hoped.MGJR wrote: ↑Mon Jun 02, 2025 1:09 pm Anyone believing all these headlines is as gullible as they come. In each instance, Berryessa, Oroville, Tahoe- a boat, which had to have been moored for a prolonged period, in an infected area, sufficient to build up a population of fully grown adult mussels, just so happened to pack up, and head to another reservoir and launch the same day. The statistical improbability is unquestionable for it to happen once, maybe even twice; but this may times under the circumstances is fishy at best. Mark my word - they will lock everything down, institute expensive tags, inspections and decontaminations. Do you think they are doing anything to the ships/persons bringing these into the state in the first place? Nope - you get to pay.
It’s funny, I have found in my everyday dealings in life that those prone to “conspiracies” are generally more gullible people….So are all the workers at these inspection stations in on this conspiracy?
I would encourage you to read some of the very insightful links that have been shared in other threads; specifically how this mussel has spread in South America. This is literally how it happens, it’s so crazy to watch people deny it in real time.
We'll just have to see how it turns out....MGJR wrote: ↑Tue Jun 03, 2025 11:29 am The point is - they are not focusing on or containing the source. Rather they are using incomplete science to usher policy to basically quarantine the healthy (and trying to validate themselves). And as history serves us, this will likely result in more regulation, cost and inconvenience, while, virtually doing nothing to protect the resource. Lastly, an appeal to authority fallacy would be if I said I was right, because of my qualifications. I was accused of being a conspiracy theorist; however, I was making the point I actually have a background in the sciences, have read, and understand the underlying literature.
birdman920 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 03, 2025 7:35 pm it’s the same liberal mindset that they have been using for decades! “never let a crisis go to waste “ they used it during Covid and they will use it now ! their ultimate goal is to end all internal combustion engines in California and they will use the Golden Mussel to help reach that goal!
Sounds good dude!JVGondal wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 8:27 am Yes the upper north of Ca is not nearly as authoritarian commie liberal as the south
You can expect more a common sense approach retaining our recreational needs and freedoms
But you already knew that being in support of more government restrictions rules and regulations
It’s never enough for you until your area is privatized to meet your selfish needs