Bass Fishing Forum - Westernbass.com

Posted: **Sun Sep 20, 2009 11:17 am**

no need to put your name, just would like to know how many of you think what he said was OK

Posted: **Sun Sep 20, 2009 12:01 pm**

I did not think of calling President Obama a â€œBOYâ€

Posted: **Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:06 pm**

[quote="Marty"]I did not think of calling President Obama a â€œBOYâ€

Posted: **Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:14 pm**

biteme wrote:You can see it? You've been doing it from the first day he stepped into office,lol

No Biteme, I was doing it before he stepped into office. LOL

Posted: **Sun Sep 20, 2009 11:36 pm**

Back when there were pay phones do you remember what we used to say in cases like this? "Here's a dime, call someone who gives a ****."

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:23 am**

CAN YOU SAY OBSESSED?????

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:54 am**

No, I'm done now. To me Greggg showed what he is. And the rest of the people that visit this board, well lets just say I had hoped more would speak out against it. but that might have been to much to ask

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 5:39 am**

You're right, it only took 16 posts about "Boy" before you were finished. That isn't too obsessive.

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 5:54 am**

so do you agree with him on his statement?
If anyone else had come on and condemed his statement , it might have ended sooner , its hard for one person to stand against something like that but I did'nt see a bunck of the libs or R's jumping on the banb wagon the defend a conservetive.

Maybe its just Obama and the Libs we're not supposed to bash.

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:05 am**

I guess its official. On this site you can call someone a racist with impunity as long as you do it in a "lighthearted" way. lol
This could be fun. I don't want to hear any complaints from Greggy-boy cause he can call someone who give a ****. The racist Greggy-boy who belonged to the Dukes of Hazzard fan club. Yea, that Greggy-boy.

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:40 am**

smittyfish wrote:You're right, it only took 16 posts about "Boy" before you were finished. That isn't too obsessive.

Nice try with the diversion smitty.

But isn't the fact that Greg is too chicken.... to admit he was wrong the real issue here!

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:58 am**

I'm not trying to create a diversion. I just think it is obvious that Greg doesn't want to answer the question. I think when it take 16 posts and three new topics, that it is very much obsessive. Why is everything so confrontational with you guys.

I don't agree with Greg. I think he made a very bad assumption or guess as to what he thought Wilson wanted to say.

I also think it was in bad taste and very insulting to shout out in the middle of the presidents address. He can say all he wants after the president is finished.

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:41 pm**

smittyfish wrote: Why is everything so confrontational with you guys. The fact people debate one another is confrontational to you smitty?

I don't agree with Greg. I think he made a very bad assumption or guess as to what he thought Wright wanted to say.
Yet this is the first time you admit it, but didn't have a problem pointing out an " obsession" .

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:26 pm**

Its looking like a campaign to make a man say "Uncle" to me.

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:38 pm**

No, it's more of a campaign to call someone on their b.s.

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:44 pm**

I've been in the schoolyard and I know the difference.

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:10 pm**

Vince I'm glad you can tell them apart, I stated I was from the south, I'm white , 57 and an R. And that his statment to me was no less than using the N-word to a black and I said very plainly I wanted to know how he came up with the Boy and then added a question about rs voting him in. I did not start out to beat him up, and consider beating on him to be less of a crime than what he did[ although some others seem to think the beating on him was the crime].

I relize I am an asshole and am prepared to live with it Thank you for your input.

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:30 pm**

Do you think a southern upbringing gives an exclusive glimpse into the darkness of racism?

I'm a 42 year old kid from the east bay currently living in the north valley where black people have been scarce until recently but illegals rule. I learned how not to trust my fellow man by being jumped by a group of black thugs while waiting for a cow palace concert to start.
(note: do not wander in the Geneva neighborhood while waiting for an event to begin. The cops said I was lucky to not have been killed)

I grew up listening to racist remarks from parents and grandparents.
We all have to seize the reins and think for ourselves at some point don't we?

You're only an asshole if you won't admit that you were being mean. Period.

It doesn't matter what point you were trying to make and how right you were in your quest.
You were being mean. Period.

Isn't a failure to admit certain things always someone's beef in a politician?

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:50 pm**

Hey 2nd,

You seem to have an OBSESSION with everything that I say. It goes back to something else we disagreed about earlier. I don't remember what it was, but I'm sure that you were right, you always are......lol.

I guess I'm just not used to attack as being part of a debate. I always thought of calm, cool discussion as being part of a debate. But you always seem to jump to hostility.

I never thought this would go this far that is why I never admitted to anything. Yes their is definitely an obsession here on a couple of peoples part now.

Feel free to jump down my thorat again........ I think it makes you feel big and strong with your keyboard courage.

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:53 pm**

Oh God!!!
Here we go again.

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:54 pm**

Byt the way, Rod said that he was done with this at 5:00 this morning. Why do you continue to carry on with the battle.

I think you are just looking for more confrontation from me, or debate as you like to think of it.

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:57 pm**

I admire your tenacity.

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 3:05 pm**

Vince E wrote:Do you think a southern upbringing gives an exclusive glimpse into the darkness of racism?

I'm a 42 year old kid from the east bay currently living in the north valley where black people have been scarce until recently but illegals rule. I learned how not to trust my fellow man by being jumped by a group of black thugs while waiting for a cow palace concert to start.
(note: do not wander in the Geneva neighborhood while waiting for an event to begin. The cops said I was lucky to not have been killed)

I grew up listening to racist remarks from parents and grandparents.
We all have to seize the reins and think for ourselves at some point don't we?

You're only an asshole if you won't admit that you were being mean. Period.

It doesn't matter what point you were trying to make and how right you were in your quest.
You were being mean. Period.

Isn't a failure to admit certain things always someone's beef in a politician?

I tryed to reply to your post but the fourm would'nt let me now it appears differnt. did you change it while I was writng?

doesnt matter I do that too sometimes

Being from the south does make my view differnt from your but more important my being the same as far as white, male, southern, and and R, for al intents and purposes makes Gregs statment apply to me and other men like me NOT just the congressman

and I can tell you that my feelings about that are the same as using the N-word to a black person

you said something about[darn wish I had qouted you]oh well I'll let that go.

being mean, no I wanted to know what he meant[ now I remember] go back and reread my first post, it was not that bad, so no I think he would not have answered anyway.

so no I dont think that because I dont admitt to being mean I'm the same as him
At least I'm doing my best to answer your questios and even your statments that were edited.

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 3:09 pm**

Oh now I remember what was edited.

I think we have changed places, You have become me and I greg, except I have tryed to answer your questions to the best of my ability

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 3:21 pm**

I'm sorry Rod. I posted:

"I think if you had asked the question differently Greg would have given you a detailed explanation a week ago."

That might not have been exact but it was the point I was going to make.
I deleted it because I was afraid you would focus on it and ignore the post I made before it, which I decided was more important.
I could always add the other post later if I didn't allow myself to be overly distracted by whatever answer you would post.

That is my honest line of thinking on that.

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 3:26 pm**

I was trying to say too much at one time. I should limit myself to just one statement at a time.

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 3:49 pm**

But you are right. We have changed roles.
Now you are the witch and I am the hunter.
And you are at least answering the questions.

"Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!"

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:12 pm**

that ok with gregggs attitude, I guess I'll change to just mean and keep going. you guys seem to enjoy it.

you will notice that greggg is still mouthing off. but has never come close to an answer.

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:21 pm**

Wow, 7 votes. Rod, you need to make your pole longer. (That's a play on words).

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:43 pm**

Where did you get the Boy from Greggg, In the past you've always had a story or just got thru e-mailing someone or talking to , or your sisters aunts uncle did something. That fit right in with what was going on here on the forum.

Well as good as you are at making things up, maybe thats what you've been doing all along

Greg Cornish chief story teller

Taken with a grain of salt.

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:06 pm**

Rod Martin wrote: In the past you've always had a story or just got thru e-mailing someone or talking to , or your sisters aunts uncle did something. That fit right in with what was going on here on the forum.

mao

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:22 pm**

smittyfish wrote:Hey 2nd,

I guess I'm just not used to attack as being part of a debate. I always thought of calm, cool discussion as being part of a debate.

Dude I don't think you're used to a debate period.

deÂ·bate [di bÃ¡yt]

1. talk or argue about something: to talk about something at length and in detail, especially as part of a formal exchange of opinion.

Sorry smitty I had no idea you were so sensitive.

When you rudely attacked my intellect I assumed you could take it as well as you dished it out.

Posted: **Tue Sep 22, 2009 5:56 pm**

Where and when did I rudely attack your intellect???

Where in your definition of debate does it mention personal attacks???

Keep piling it on buddy, I can take all you got.

Posted: **Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:59 pm**

smittyfish wrote:Where and when did I rudely attack your intellect???

HEy 2nd,

Using that language really shows your level of intellect, or better yet, your lack of intellect. You can talk and be heard and be much more respected if you talk without profanity. Or is that just more of your conservative ways. Oh wait, I remember hearing your last VP use that same language. I guess it really is a conservative thing.

Where in your definition of debate does it mention personal attacks???

Like I said before, I thought that if you could dish it out then you could take it, but obviously you're sensitive side gets the best of you.

Keep piling it on buddy, I can take all you got.

When I get pissed off, I'll admit it and it shows.
Like the guys I hunt and fish with, we are what we are and are not afraid to hide it.
Would I loose my temper and cuss in front of women and children, absolutely not.
But this is not a chat room full of women, children or whiny metrosexuals, it's a political forum on a fishing website, get over it and lets move on.

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2009 5:01 am**

Hey this thread is about ME!

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2009 5:26 am**

Whats a metrosexual?

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2009 5:50 am**

Skeeterman wrote:Whats a metrosexual?

Ok, I just found what it was a couple of months ago.
In a nutshell itâ€™s a guy most of us on here would call a sissy.

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2009 5:57 am**

Greg_Cornish wrote:Hey this thread is about ME!

Greg, did you hear that the Peanut President called the Boy President â€œthis black boyâ€

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2009 6:08 am**

Absolutely beautiful speech at the U.N. today.

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2009 6:59 am**

Greg_Cornish wrote:Absolutely beautiful speech at the U.N. today.

Greg, pull up your underwear after he done with you!

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2009 7:08 am**

Marty,Greggg has a pass. He doesnt answer questions anymore.
Just posts bits and peices of his dreams I think.

I was thinking about this as I flew back yesterday. Have you noticed a differnce in greggg over the last year. He might have had his drugs changed or maybe a small stroke. I know my Dad changed after a stroke he had just before he died.
Hes not his old self. just kind of wanders around making random posts
I would'nt expect much of an answer from him.

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2009 8:32 am**

Greg_Cornish wrote:Absolutely beautiful speech at the U.N. today.

UN members love, love, love such a weak American "leader". You can bet that leaders from places like Iran, Moscow, Honduras and Venezuela have a new sense of focus and energy, they are thrilled to have such a weak American leader. They are in 100% agreement with your statement here too Greg - beautful indeed.

Posted: **Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:05 am**

Rod Martin wrote:Marty,Greggg has a pass. He doesnt answer questions anymore.
Just posts bits and peices of his dreams I think.

I was thinking about this as I flew back yesterday. Have you noticed a differnce in greggg over the last year. He might have had his drugs changed or maybe a small stroke. I know my Dad changed after a stroke he had just before he died.
Hes not his old self. just kind of wanders around making random posts
I would'nt expect much of an answer from him.

Rod, I think it is because he is going under the knife on Monday and he is scared!

Posted: **Fri Sep 25, 2009 12:30 pm**

well after the drugs wear off he should be full of new material for the forum.

Posted: **Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:09 pm**

Marty wrote:Rod, I think it is because he is going under the knife on Monday and he is scared!

I aint scared of no knife. Just Menuedo.

Posted: **Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:55 pm**

Besides cancer, I got eczema, diarrhea, gonorrhea and hemorrhoids last week. First time I won a game of scrabble!

Posted: **Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:43 pm**

Greg, get in touch with ACORN and you might be able to vote twice on this poll.

Posted: **Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:03 pm**

2ndsuks wrote:Greg, get in touch with ACORN and you might be able to vote twice on this poll.

LOL Thanks for the tip. But I recused myself from this vote.

Bass Fishing Forum - Westernbass.com

Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment

Re: Poll for or against Gregggs "Boy" statment