read please

Post Reply
barse41
Posts: 630
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:49 pm
Location: waterford

read please

Post by barse41 »

Hi, my name is Nick Barse, I am doing a report on the San Joaquin Delta, and its troubled ecosystem. If you are aware of the recent laws passed concerning the Delta, could you please take the time to participate in my survey. Thank you.

1.stronlgy disagree 2.disagree 3.no comment 4. agree 5.strogly agree

1. Recent increases in delta water exports are directly related to the sudden decline of several delta fish species.
2. Increasing water exports by building a peripheral canal will make problems in the delta worse.
3. Funding for the California department of fish and game is vital in protecting the delta wildlife's future.
4. Action for restoring the delta's waterways needs to happen immediately, rather than years down the line.
5. The governor is doing a disappointing job protecting California’s natural resources.


Thanks again for your time









also: your favorite lure and location for delta largemouth :wink:
just kidding
Last edited by barse41 on Mon Oct 27, 2008 7:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
DanIsaac
Posts: 2233
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:25 pm

Re: read please

Post by DanIsaac »

1. =4 but it's been over time.
2. =4 projects never seem to end up being as promised in CA
3. =2
4. =5
5. =5


favorite lure: Wadda Jig
favorite location: Pilot Slough
User avatar
JustinD
Posts: 940
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 6:38 am
Location: Washington

Re: read please

Post by JustinD »

Lets do what we can to help this kid out....BUMP....
LL South
User avatar
RyanThoni
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 1:29 pm

Re: read please

Post by RyanThoni »

1.4
2.4
3.4
4.5
4.5
Ryan Thoni
rjthoni@gmail.com

Society speaks and all men listen, mountains speak and wise men listen
User avatar
Marty
Posts: 4333
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 8:04 pm
Location: Delta
Contact:

Re: read please

Post by Marty »

1.= 3
2.= 3
3.= 5
4.= 4
4.= 4
Image
User avatar
Guy Kelley
Posts: 1147
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 4:58 pm
Location: Delta Red Neck

Re: read please

Post by Guy Kelley »

[quote="barse41"]hey guys im working on a big project for a college class im taking. i decided to do the project on the water crisis in the delta. part of the requirments are that i submit a interview and a public survey. i think we're all on the same page here so i thought id ask you guys. if you wouldnt mind answering my survey it would help me out a whole lot.
thanks, Nick Barse


1.stronlgy disagree 2.disagree 3.no coment 4. agree 5.strogly agree

1. recent increases in delta water exports are directly related to the sudden decline of several delta fish species.
2. increasing water exports by building a peripheral canal will make problems in the delta worse.
3.funding for the california department of fish and game is vital in protecting the delta wildlife's futre.
4.action for restoring the delta's waterways needs to happen immediatly, rather than years down the line.
5. the governor is doing a dissapointing job protecting california's natural resources.
thanks again for your time





also: your favorite lure and location for delta largemouth :wink:
just kidding[/quote]
1.=5
2.=5
3.=4
4.=5
5.=2

Rip Bait / Disappointment Slu. Just Kidding :P

Note, your wording on question 2. Increasing water exports ?

IMHOP, The new peripheral along with other measures currently under study could help solve some of the current problems with the delta. But, if water export is (increased) to past historic levels or beyond, it will have an devastating effect. Which would be a exact opposite to what is expected to be achieved with a new canal system !
Long Nguyen
Posts: 950
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 7:33 pm
Location: Bay area

Re: read please

Post by Long Nguyen »

barse41 wrote:...i think we're all on the same page here so i thought id ask you guys....


1.stronlgy disagree 2.disagree 3.no coment 4. agree 5.strogly agree

1. recent increases in delta water exports are directly related to the sudden decline of several delta fish species.
2. increasing water exports by building a peripheral canal will make problems in the delta worse.
3.funding for the california department of fish and game is vital in protecting the delta wildlife's futre.
4.action for restoring the delta's waterways needs to happen immediatly, rather than years down the line.
5. the governor is doing a dissapointing job protecting california's natural resources.
thanks again for your time
Hi Nick,

I'll participate in your survey but I don't think you're getting a good cross sample of the general public if you're asking bass anglers like yourself.

Of course we all feel the same way about the delta and natural resources so your results will be skewed. If that's what you're looking for, then great. But if you need a sample of the general population, you need to look else where too.

1. 4
2. 4
3. 2
4. 5
5. 5
Long Nguyen
Posts: 950
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 7:33 pm
Location: Bay area

Re: read please

Post by Long Nguyen »

barse41 wrote:...i think we're all on the same page here so i thought id ask you guys....


1.stronlgy disagree 2.disagree 3.no coment 4. agree 5.strogly agree

1. recent increases in delta water exports are directly related to the sudden decline of several delta fish species.
2. increasing water exports by building a peripheral canal will make problems in the delta worse.
3.funding for the california department of fish and game is vital in protecting the delta wildlife's futre.
4.action for restoring the delta's waterways needs to happen immediatly, rather than years down the line.
5. the governor is doing a dissapointing job protecting california's natural resources.
thanks again for your time
Hi Nick,

I'll participate in your survey but I don't think you're getting a good cross sample of the general public if you're asking bass anglers like yourself.

Of course we all feel the same way about the delta and natural resources so your results will be skewed. If that's what you're looking for, then great. But if you need a sample of the general population, you need to look else where too.

1. 4
2. 4
3. 2
4. 5
5. 5
blkdog812
Posts: 874
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: "If people concentrated on the really important things in life, there'd be

Re: read please

Post by blkdog812 »

1:5
2:5
3:3
4:4
5:5
barse41
Posts: 630
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:49 pm
Location: waterford

Re: read please

Post by barse41 »

you guys would be suprised how many college students have no idea california is in any sort of a drought. this is part two of a three part project. thanks for your responses
thanks guys
Last edited by barse41 on Mon Oct 27, 2008 7:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
texas john
Posts: 443
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 10:22 pm
Contact:

Re: read please

Post by texas john »

1. 5
2. 5
3. 4
4. 5
5. 3

Even though he is in charge, and not who I voted for, we have to remeber the govenor is like the president in the sence that he is only one part of a greater problem....Theres my two cents for the month...
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v356/jtrtexca/usmcsealani.gif[/img]
www.johnrector.yolasite.com
www.pepperjigs.com
Post Reply