Flick Shake - Which size do you guys prefer?

Post Reply
Kevin
Posts: 1885
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 10:52 pm

Flick Shake - Which size do you guys prefer?

Post by Kevin »

Inquiring minds want to know!!!!!!!
biteme
Posts: 2479
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:01 am

Re: Flick Shake - Which size do you guys prefer?

Post by biteme »

5.8 but I think they all catch fish
mac (Doyle McEwen)
Posts: 2755
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 9:39 am
Location: San Jose, CA

Re: Flick Shake - Which size do you guys prefer?

Post by mac (Doyle McEwen) »

I prefer all of the sizes..Then I let the bass pick the size they want to chomp on..

mac
Take a kid fishing, and don't forget about us older kids either..
cleb19
Posts: 428
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 8:43 pm

Re: Flick Shake - Which size do you guys prefer?

Post by cleb19 »

Doesnt Work. NO SIZES!!!!!1
GKramer
Posts: 523
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 5:45 pm

Re: Flick Shake - Which size do you guys prefer?

Post by GKramer »

Since all bites "weigh" the same, I like the 4.8 on their lightest head with 6-pound. You get more bites, hook more fish--and that usually grinds your partner--which we all love to do. :D

gk
www.kramergonefishing.com
492slayer
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 4:33 pm
Location: Yuba City, Ca

Re: Flick Shake - Which size do you guys prefer?

Post by 492slayer »

I used 6" roboworms to "flick-shake" or what we used to call wacky rigging, and have no shortage of fish in the boat. My buddy paid some good coin for the Jackall's but while they caught fish, he sure went through a ton of baits. When the bait tears, I simply run the hook between the sections that are torn and get another 3-4 fish off the same bait. I know those flick-shake worms have a special bend to them, but I don't think the spots at Oroville really give a crap...
'97 492VS
335HP EFI by Simon Motorsports
biteme
Posts: 2479
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:01 am

Re: Flick Shake - Which size do you guys prefer?

Post by biteme »

492slayer wrote:I used 6" roboworms to "flick-shake" or what we used to call wacky rigging, and have no shortage of fish in the boat. My buddy paid some good coin for the Jackall's but while they caught fish, he sure went through a ton of baits. When the bait tears, I simply run the hook between the sections that are torn and get another 3-4 fish off the same bait. I know those flick-shake worms have a special bend to them, but I don't think the spots at Oroville really give a crap...
Your right about that last part,lol :lol:
User avatar
Will Hesch
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Atascadero, CA
Contact:

Re: Flick Shake - Which size do you guys prefer?

Post by Will Hesch »

cleb's right, they don't work, don't waste your time...but...if you do, the 6.8 works the best and is the easiest to throw...but, they really don't work...
www.centralcoastbassfishing.com
www.coolfoot.biz
www.mend-it.com
www.bac-rac.com
"wouldn't you rather be fishing?"
User avatar
Brian D.
Posts: 4155
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 8:12 am
Location: Deep South
Contact:

I prefer...

Post by Brian D. »

the 5.8 in. Works fine; everytime. Like most soft plastic baits, they can be 1 fish wonders but there are few tricks to get more fish per bait. The O-ring trick works if you can find them that small but if Im running low, I'll use a thin 1/4 wrap of black electrical tape in the middle, then I just run the wacky jig hook thru the tape. Any more than that will affect the overall action/presentation.
~~ I'm trying to think but nothing happens ~~
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8MhaihAw7I&feature=related
Post Reply
cron