Accountability - or NOT!

[Senkosam]

Those in high office often get maybe a slap on the wrist or zero penalty for illegal or unethical decisions and actions. Who holds persons in high office accountable? Ultimately the voter. But in the case of Dozing Don, a large percentage of those who still support him, turn a blind eye to what he's done, what he's doing and what he will do that's illegal, unethical (self-serving, vindictive) and immoral (the killing of supposed drug runners to destroy proof.)

Not holding Dozy Don accountable means accepting his narrative minus the full story when files are redacted, not released in full or not released at all. His supporters are fine with that, believing that T will always have their interests at heart, but that at the same time that he will always be on the right side of justice. Never mind that he pardoned one of the biggest drug traffickers in U.S. history to the tune of 400 tons of drugs imported, but let's not forget the over 1,000 rioters he pardoned that rushed the capital.

T will go down as the only president not held accountable for every action that has hurt people and their families, hurt businesses and farmers, increased the deficit and made a mockery of the justice system. His arrogance knows no bounds and, for some unfathomable reason, it's seen as his strength and resolve to do what's right for the country. Though tanking approval ratings mean squat, citizens are taking notice and Republicans better wake up and smell the sh** before it comes pouring on down them for not holding Dozy accountable.

[monte300]

For someone that ran their campaign on transparency we sure aren’t getting much.

Like you say there’s very little accountability in the regime. People like kegbreath, Kash Patel, Thumb Homan, Kristi Noeme, etc…. F’up wet dreams yet not one of his junk drawer are ever held accountable. One would think there are actually loyal AND qualified people walking the planet?