Now jiggy and f OOL can stand outside the DOJ and jack off to the new banner of the orange prick
Nice example of separation of powers
Nice example of separation of powers
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... department
Now jiggy and f OOL can stand outside the DOJ and jack off to the new banner of the orange prick
Now jiggy and f OOL can stand outside the DOJ and jack off to the new banner of the orange prick
Re: Nice example of separation of powers
Its quite gross. Image if Biden did that? OMG...
On another point, drump is putting out a trademark branding filing document, that in essence says that anything with his name on it, will require money to be paid to him and his family. Now that is a kick in the nuts to America.
https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/18/politics ... rofit-name
On another point, drump is putting out a trademark branding filing document, that in essence says that anything with his name on it, will require money to be paid to him and his family. Now that is a kick in the nuts to America.
https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/18/politics ... rofit-name
~~ I'm trying to think but nothing happens ~~
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8MhaihAw7I&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8MhaihAw7I&feature=related
Re: Nice example of separation of powers
That’s trumpanomics for ya. Selling bibles, tennis shoes and other random s h I t out of the white house further proof of the grift
Re: Nice example of separation of powers
I wonder how much jiggy and OOL have paid homage (purchased) dumpty gear and merch. I bet they have a piece of rumpty suit material incased in a shrine buy their TV as Fauxx snooze is playing.
~~ I'm trying to think but nothing happens ~~
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8MhaihAw7I&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8MhaihAw7I&feature=related
Re: Nice example of separation of powers
Weak assed Supreme Court takes a year to rule trumps tariffs obviously illegal they fail to rule on refunds. What a pitiful gang they are
Re: Nice example of separation of powers
They gave the bare minimum of a legal opinion. Basically, they said NO and didnt cite any further guidance. That is a weak ruling. They knew there were going to be consequences to the ruling but provided zero guidance to a whole new mess for rumpts unconstitutional actions.
~~ I'm trying to think but nothing happens ~~
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8MhaihAw7I&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8MhaihAw7I&feature=related
Copyright © 2013-2026 WesternBass.com ®
































Advertising