tackletour flouro "showdown" article

Post Reply
User avatar
MikeD
Posts: 1089
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 11:30 am
Location: Sonora, CA

tackletour flouro "showdown" article

Post by MikeD »

interesting read, their tests show that the flouro stretches as much as Trilene XL in some cases

http://tackletour.com/reviewfluorocarbontest.html
"I'll just drop it on their head, and then rip their lips off with a TV hookset..." <i>unnamed angler when discussing how he fishes a jig</i>
User avatar
R. Duzac
Posts: 235
Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 2:40 pm
Contact:

Re: tackletour flouro "showdown" article

Post by R. Duzac »

Remember that it stretches the same "Dry". I think the assumption is that after fishing awhile the standard Mono will assorb water and stetch more.

One other topic not touched on is the invisible factor. Hard to compare these.

I've always have liked the Trilene XL "great line".

I think the Flourcarbons do offer a better line, but it's up to you if you want to pay the price.

Just my 2 cents.
R. Duzac
User avatar
TTCal
Posts: 404
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 7:05 am
Location: San Mateo, CA
Contact:

Re: tackletour flouro "showdown" article

Post by TTCal »

R. Duzac wrote:Remember that it stretches the same "Dry". I think the assumption is that after fishing awhile the standard Mono will assorb water and stetch more.

One other topic not touched on is the invisible factor. Hard to compare these.
Yup... thanks for pointing that out RD... :)

We were concentrating on the tensile tests when the stretch factor took us by surprise, so we're working on a viable way to really compare this characteristic.

We're also working on a way to check out the invisibility claims.
Dennis "Cal" Shew
Enthusiast Tackle Editor
Tackle Tour : The Angler's source for tackle news and reviews
www.tackletour.com

[i]fish with mindfulness : beware the darkside[/i]
mark poulson
Posts: 10557
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 4:16 am
Location: Antioch, CA

Re: tackletour flouro "showdown" article

Post by mark poulson »

Great job, Dennis. Could you include where the lines are made in the next test? Just curious if there's a big difference in manufacturers.
Attitude plus effort equal success
CLEAN AND DRY
User avatar
RipnRog
Posts: 1768
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 7:06 am

Re: tackletour flouro "showdown" article

Post by RipnRog »

You may want to reread the story as they did include where the lines are made.
User avatar
TTCal
Posts: 404
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 7:05 am
Location: San Mateo, CA
Contact:

Re: tackletour flouro "showdown" article

Post by TTCal »

Thanks guys... i think we mentioned some are made in Germany and some are made in Japan, but i don't think we stated, specifically, which are manufactured where.

We usually try to include that information in the individual review of products, but it's looking more and more like we need to do a follow up to the first article with some additional, group tests and comparisons.

I'll make note and try to include the "made in" info for each product in the next article.

But as I recall, the only two lines we have that said "Made in Germany" were the Triple Fish and Maxima.

Interesting caveat, the Berkley Vanish Transition, says "Made in USA".
Dennis "Cal" Shew
Enthusiast Tackle Editor
Tackle Tour : The Angler's source for tackle news and reviews
www.tackletour.com

[i]fish with mindfulness : beware the darkside[/i]
User avatar
RipnRog
Posts: 1768
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 7:06 am

Re: tackletour flouro "showdown" article

Post by RipnRog »

Hey Cal I was going to purchase soem of the triple fish as the price seems to be right. I went to there website and they are not so low is there another place that would have a better price?
User avatar
TTCal
Posts: 404
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 7:05 am
Location: San Mateo, CA
Contact:

Re: tackletour flouro "showdown" article

Post by TTCal »

I think I got our test spools of TripleFish from TackleWarehouse...
Dennis "Cal" Shew
Enthusiast Tackle Editor
Tackle Tour : The Angler's source for tackle news and reviews
www.tackletour.com

[i]fish with mindfulness : beware the darkside[/i]
User avatar
MikeD
Posts: 1089
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 11:30 am
Location: Sonora, CA

Re: tackletour flouro "showdown" article

Post by MikeD »

Dennis - great article, nice to see someone test manufac. claims with real world comparisions. I'm a seaguar user and noticed that you ran out of line - are you planning on going back and filling in the blanks?

any thoughts on the "wet stretch" issues noted above with mono?

Now if you could do some rod testing so that we can better understand flex and power vs trying to guess based on "line weight" and "action" when I attempt to buy a rod

edit: just saw this:
We were concentrating on the tensile tests when the stretch factor took us by surprise, so we're working on a viable way to really compare this characteristic.
Last edited by MikeD on Wed Mar 28, 2007 7:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
"I'll just drop it on their head, and then rip their lips off with a TV hookset..." <i>unnamed angler when discussing how he fishes a jig</i>
cLanderman
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 9:05 am
Location: Boulder City, NV

Re: tackletour flouro "showdown" article

Post by cLanderman »

That was a great article... finally some numbers to go with the legions of bias arguments.
User avatar
TTCal
Posts: 404
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 7:05 am
Location: San Mateo, CA
Contact:

Re: tackletour flouro "showdown" article

Post by TTCal »

MikeD wrote:Now if you could do some rod testing so that we can better understand flex and power vs trying to guess based on "line weight" and "action" when I attempt to buy a rod
Thanks Mike,

Have you seen our recent rod reviews? We've been taking some measurements for deflection and comparing rods against one another so you can kind of get an idea how a rod might behave on the water. Here's a chart from a recent review:

Image

Granted, this does not tell you anything about the taper of the rod, and it's not fool proof, but for the majority of rods we've measured thus far, the ones that share similar deflection curves do have a similar feel to each other with they way they load up for casting and working your bait.
Dennis "Cal" Shew
Enthusiast Tackle Editor
Tackle Tour : The Angler's source for tackle news and reviews
www.tackletour.com

[i]fish with mindfulness : beware the darkside[/i]
User avatar
MikeD
Posts: 1089
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 11:30 am
Location: Sonora, CA

Re: tackletour flouro "showdown" article

Post by MikeD »

TTCal wrote:Have you seen our recent rod reviews?
I have not seen that. I'll get back in there and have another look, that's excellent, thanks!
"I'll just drop it on their head, and then rip their lips off with a TV hookset..." <i>unnamed angler when discussing how he fishes a jig</i>
Triton Mike
Posts: 299
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Acworth, Georgia
Contact:

Re: tackletour flouro "showdown" article

Post by Triton Mike »

Ripnrod, The reason the prices on the Triple Fish site are HIGHER than elsewhere is so that they don't undercut their dealers. Cal is right Tacklewarehouse sells Triple Fish.

Mike
User avatar
Topwater All Day
Posts: 749
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: NC

Re: tackletour flouro "showdown" article

Post by Topwater All Day »

Great article!!! Tons of great info in there!!!

What about the Fluoroucarbon coated lines? I am curious how these measure up with 100% Fluoro and mono. I would love to see this test in the future.

I have been using the Cuda fluoro coated lines and I am sold on this stuff!!! It takes a little getting used to and it can coil up a lot...until it gets wet! Then it is awesome! Abrasion resistance seems great with this line, but I have no idea if it is really "invisible under water" like 100% fluoro.


Rob
Cooch

Most Excellent info!

Post by Cooch »

Great review guys! I do have one question for ya Cal, in the ending statement and conclusion, you guys speak of, "individutal on the water reviews", MANG, I knew you guys were inta some strange and exciting stuff, but I can't wait ta hear more about this experience!! :lol: :lol: :lol:
Vernonn
Posts: 232
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 5:32 am
Location: Lincoln, CA

Milky Fluorocarbon

Post by Vernonn »

Cal,

I've bought and used several brands of fluorocarbon lines over the years and couple lines have turned milky after a few hours of use. They all start out clear and hard to see under water, but a few brands have turned white after fishing for half a day, which isn't supposed to be the case. In the invisibility test you might want to let the lines stand in the water for a several hours before seeing how invisible they really are.

Just a thought!!

Thanks for the great reports!!!

-vernon
User avatar
TTCal
Posts: 404
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 7:05 am
Location: San Mateo, CA
Contact:

Re: Most Excellent info!

Post by TTCal »

Cooch wrote:Great review guys! I do have one question for ya Cal, in the ending statement and conclusion, you guys speak of, "individutal on the water reviews", MANG, I knew you guys were inta some strange and exciting stuff, but I can't wait ta hear more about this experience!! :lol: :lol: :lol:
LOL... see what happens when you test lines? Gets your fingers all tied up in knots! :lol: :lol:
Dennis "Cal" Shew
Enthusiast Tackle Editor
Tackle Tour : The Angler's source for tackle news and reviews
www.tackletour.com

[i]fish with mindfulness : beware the darkside[/i]
User avatar
TTCal
Posts: 404
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 7:05 am
Location: San Mateo, CA
Contact:

Re: Milky Fluorocarbon

Post by TTCal »

Vernonn wrote:Cal,

I've bought and used several brands of fluorocarbon lines over the years and couple lines have turned milky after a few hours of use. They all start out clear and hard to see under water, but a few brands have turned white after fishing for half a day, which isn't supposed to be the case. In the invisibility test you might want to let the lines stand in the water for a several hours before seeing how invisible they really are.

Just a thought!!

Thanks for the great reports!!!

-vernon
Thanks for the thought Vernonn... yes, actually, some turn this way just sitting on the shelf with no exposure to water or the sun.. :cry:
Dennis "Cal" Shew
Enthusiast Tackle Editor
Tackle Tour : The Angler's source for tackle news and reviews
www.tackletour.com

[i]fish with mindfulness : beware the darkside[/i]
User avatar
Jim Conlow Sr.
Posts: 1306
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Benicia Ca

what about different manufacturing batches---same brand

Post by Jim Conlow Sr. »

I wonder how much variation you may find in different manufacturing runs from the same brand.
I know that this could go on forever but it is very interesting. It looks like you could make a book out of this research. I for one will buy it
[i][b]Ride With a [size=200]Legend[/size][/b][/i]
www.legendmarine.com
www.mercurymarine.com
www.inland-marine.com
[img]http://www.westernbass.com/shared/sponsors/150x50/legend.jpg[/img]
User avatar
Tobe
Posts: 923
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 12:04 pm

Re: what about different manufacturing batches---same brand*

Post by Tobe »

*NM*
Last edited by Tobe on Mon Jul 23, 2007 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
tunaman
Posts: 4858
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:26 pm
Location: Now in Henderson, NV

Re: what about different manufacturing batches---same brand

Post by tunaman »

The one point none of this addresses is RECOVERY... all lines stretch - even braid. However, braid and flourocarbon don't recover like mono. So, once they stretch out, they remain stretched for long periods of time rather than stretch and recover like mono. This is a significant factor, and a major difference between the three types.
Nicholas H.
Posts: 144
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 2:24 pm
Location: Orygun

Re: what about different manufacturing batches---same brand

Post by Nicholas H. »

Tobe, if you go back and read the testing and what the charts actually show, I think you will find that the Gamma and XPS didn't test out that well, while the Sunline product did. The key to this Part one of the test is to look at the line diameters. You will see that Gamma is simply taking a 14lb test line and slapping a 10lb label on it. Therefore, the "FC Rated Strength Comparison" test clearly proves this with the variance of breaking strength say, for the Gamma product. If you go to the "FC Material Strength Chart (psi)", you will see here where the Gamma while still rating well, falls short of the Sunline product which you claim to test low. As far as knot strength tests go, one: using a Palomar knot (which is the most common knot) there are many variables. While I would have liked to see the test conducted with the use of a San Diego Jam Knot (as this not will not cut into itself), I'm happy to see this overall comparison done. I know in the end the best products will ultimately be on top. I know which 2 lines should be at the top when all is said and done. Time will tell. I will save my overall critique of this complete testing until the end. I have already noticed some "red flags" with this first part of the test, we'll see if they are cleared up by the end of the complete test. Until then, enjoy what are sure to be some Monster weights on Clear Lake this week!!!!
mark poulson
Posts: 10557
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 4:16 am
Location: Antioch, CA

Re: Most Excellent info!

Post by mark poulson »

Cooch,
I asked sTony for spellcheck. He suggested I do a smellcheck instead. :shock:
Attitude plus effort equal success
CLEAN AND DRY
Cooch

Re: what about different manufacturing batches---same brand

Post by Cooch »

Tobe,
I was surprised to see that the high end lines like Sugoi and Sunline performed so poorly.
I actually thought, consistantly accros the board, that the Sugoi and Seagaur performed well. Along with Torray, all made by Koreah Chemical Company. I also felt it was very strong in the rated area, where it tested for breaking strength at 12 pound test, versus lines that are breaking much higher than they are rated. Seems to me to be a misrepresentation of yer line test if it's breaking 2-3 pounds higher than what it's rated for. Now the Berkeley Transition, that is a line I use that performed poorly! I can hear the "I told ya sos" comming! :lol: :lol:
mark poulson
Posts: 10557
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 4:16 am
Location: Antioch, CA

Re: what about different manufacturing batches---same brand

Post by mark poulson »

Cooch wrote: I actually thought, consistantly accros the board, that the Sugoi and Seagaur performed well. Along with Torray, all made by Koreah Chemical Company. I also felt it was very strong in the rated area, where it tested for breaking strength at 12 pound test, versus lines that are breaking much higher than they are rated. Seems to me to be a misrepresentation of yer line test if it's breaking 2-3 pounds higher than what it's rated for. Now the Berkeley Transition, that is a line I use that performed poorly! I can hear the "I told ya sos" comming! :lol: :lol:
That's why I'm curious/interested in which line is made where. I noticed that Dennis says Vanish is the only line labeled "Made in USA", so I would guess Berekley makes it inhouse.
Anyway, the tests so far have confirmed my suspicions that most of the lines are very similar, except in price, and that all of them work well. How well we monitor line abrasion, check for kinks and nicks, and how well we tie our lures, as well as how well we play the fish, probably has more to due with line failure than the actual product. I did have a very negative experience with both Vanish and Transition, but my partner is still using the Transition I gave him, and he doesn't break off any more than I do. I guess it was me. After all, you seem to do pretty well with Transition. :wink:
Attitude plus effort equal success
CLEAN AND DRY
Post Reply