flourocarbon question!

Post Reply
brian yee
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 10:22 pm
Location: san francisco

flourocarbon question!

Post by brian yee »

ok so between say... 15lb and 8lb test flourocarbon line:
which will sink faster?
15lb because of the mass? (flouro is denser, so does the thicker line allow it to sink faster?)

or

8lb test? (because of the thinner line diameter, and lesser friction?)

stumped...

lastly, will flouro sink in saltwater even though salth20 is denser than fresh20.

thank you all
User avatar
Bill K
Posts: 1736
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 6:26 am
Location: susanville, ca (Lake Forest)

Re: flourocarbon question!

Post by Bill K »

I do not know if I am 100% correct or not, but I do believe 15 will sink faster than 8 in the flouro. As for Saltwater and sinking, yes it will sink. Remember Flourocarbon got it's start in salt water and big game/fish situations. Bill K :)
Fun fishing the country, each and every week.
brian yee
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 10:22 pm
Location: san francisco

Re: flourocarbon question!

Post by brian yee »

thank you
User avatar
Tobe
Posts: 923
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 12:04 pm

Re: flourocarbon question!

Post by Tobe »

Brian,

I'm sure your question could be answered on the Tackle Tour Forum.

They did a Fluorocarbon study a few months back that was very informative.

www.tackletour.com
mark poulson
Posts: 10640
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 4:16 am
Location: Antioch, CA

Re: flourocarbon question!

Post by mark poulson »

I've found that, on long casts with the same lighter (1/8-3/8oz shakey heads, jigs, Senkos, Ikas) weight lure, the 8 falls faster because of it's smaller diameter. A long cast's worth of 15 has a lot of surface on the fall.
And on heavier jigs, the fall rate difference is minimal.
Attitude plus effort equal success
CLEAN AND DRY
kopper_bass
Moderator
Posts: 1108
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 7:27 pm
Location: Redwood City, CA

Re: flourocarbon question!

Post by kopper_bass »

Mark,
I was going to say the same thing, you're right on.
Technically speaking, the differences in the 2 line weights should have some degree of measurable differerence, but its going to be miniscule.

As you stated, your going to notice the difference the most when using a light weight bait and making long casts to deeper water. a heavier bait will all but void any differences.

The root cause of why 8lb line (even with just plain mono) is going to sink faster than the 15lb is not due to the flouro or density of the line, but a simple nemesis called "friction". The bigger diameter line has more surface area and is going to "drag" thru the water, thus drop slower than the smaller diameter 8lb line.

Even then the differences, say with a 3/8 weight, is going to be in the realm of 1-2 seconds at most, likely much less. With a 1 ton jig you wouldnt be able to count the difference.

Something surely of interest. it would be a great test for tackle tour to do and measure.

Kopper_Bass
Nobody remembers who came in 2nd place. Fish Hard - Play Hard!
mark poulson
Posts: 10640
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 4:16 am
Location: Antioch, CA

Re: flourocarbon question!

Post by mark poulson »

Kopper Bass,
I must have read that stuff from one of your earlier posts. :lol:
Attitude plus effort equal success
CLEAN AND DRY
User avatar
BassManDan
Posts: 1230
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 5:32 pm
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain

Re: flourocarbon question!

Post by BassManDan »

The heavier the test the faster it will sink. Fluorocarbon has a very high specific gravity (density), it is much akin to leadcore line, just not as exagerated. I figure that when using fluorocarbon, you can bump up you test weight buy 3/5 lbs over copolymer/mono, and get the same results with sinkrate etc.

Reserve your carbon for jigs and senkos. You could use it for flippin/pitchin, but I prefer the handling characteristics of a good copolymer for that stuff.

Bass Man Dan
BassManDan - 1997 Stratos 295 Pro Elite

"In the spirit of akido, sh-sh-sh-shaaa."
-Dale Gribble from TV's "King of the Hill"

"It would be the best of all possible worlds were it not for religion."
- John Adams, 1776
Post Reply