Vote Tomorrow!

[Marty]

If you haven’t done so already, please remember to vote Yes on 98 tomorrow—Tuesday, June 3rd.

Protecting the rights of property owners is fundamental to our freedoms.

Only one initiative is designed to do that: Prop 98. The other initiative is designed to undermine the rights of property owners. Before you decide, you are invited to get the facts on Prop 98 at http://www.yesprop98.com .

Your ‘Yes’ vote on Prop 98 is greatly appreciated.
Thank you.

Marty

From the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association

[Dan McKenzie]

No on 98 and No on 99.

[Fishin' Dave]

yes on guns to protect property rights.

yes on flat tax

yes on no foreign aide

yes on families

yes on the working man

yes on the finger to the UN

yes on no pork spending

yes on new roads

yes and better schools

yes on electric cars for people who live in high population areas

yes on bio fuel as a scam

yes on solar power

yes on individual freedom

yes on repealing the seatbelt law

yes on out lawing water bottles and food from cars if you are going to ban holding a cell phone

yes on animal rights

yes on hunters rights

yes on protecting the children

yes on 1 strike then execution for child molesters

yes to buying no more chinese goods

yes to america

yes to english as our language

yes to fisherman!!

yes to everything!!

[Dan McKenzie]

No on 98. While you might take this as a sign of my "liberalism", it really isn't that at all. One, I am for property owners rights 100%. My problem with 98 was attaching rent control to it. I have no vested interests in rent control property, typically these are mostly properties in heavily urbanized areas. Rent control or lack of it should be left to individual communities and not up to people like you or I. With 1 million people living in rent controlled properties around the state, what and who do you think will end up subsidizing them if it were to be eliminated? YOU and I.