Meet Sarah by a personal acquaintance

For political discussions
Post Reply
Greg_Cornish
Posts: 5422
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:37 pm
Location: Clear Lake

Meet Sarah by a personal acquaintance

Post by Greg_Cornish »

Dear friends,
So many people have asked me about what I know about Sarah Palin in the last two days that I decided to write something up . . . Basically , Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton have only two things in common: their gender and their good looks. :)

ABOUT SARAH PALIN

I am a resident of Wasilla, Alaska. I have known Sarah since 1992. Everyone here knows Sarah, so it is nothing special to say we are on a first-name basis. Our children have attended the same schools. Her father was my child's favorite substitute teacher. I also am on a first-name basis with her parents and mother-in-law. I attended more City Council meetings during her administration than about 99% of the residents of the city. She is enormously popular; in every way she's like the most popular girl in middle school. Even men who think she is a poor choice and won't vote for her can't quit smiling when talking about her because she is a "babe. "It is astonishing and almost scary how well she can keep a secret. She kept her most recent pregnancy a secret from her children and parents for seven months.

She is "pro-life." She recently gave birth to a Down's syndrome baby. There is no cover-up involved here; Trig is her baby. She is energetic and hardworking. She regularly worked out at the gym. She is savvy. She doesn't take positions; she just "puts things out there" and if they prove to be popular, then she takes credit. Her husband works a union job on the North Slope for BP and is a champion snowmobile racer. Todd Palin's kind of job is highly sought-after because of the schedule and high pay. He arranges his work schedule so he can fish for salmon in Bristol Bay for a month or so in summer, but by no stretch of the imagination is fishing
their major source of income. Nor has her lifestyle ever been anything like that of native Alaskans.

Sarah and her whole family are avid hunters. She's smart. Her experience is as mayor of a city with a population of about 5,000 (at the time), and less than two years as governor of a state with about 670,000 residents. During her mayoral administration most of the actual work of running this small city was turned over to an administrator. She had been pushed to hire this administrator by party power-brokers after she had gotten herself into some trouble over precipitous firings which had given rise to a recall campaign. Sarah campaigned in Wasilla as a fiscal conservative.

During her six years as Mayor, she increased general government expenditures by over 33%. During those same six years the amount of taxes collected by the City increased by 38%. This was during a period of low inflation(1996-2002). She reduced progressive property taxes and increased a regressive sales tax which taxed even food.

The tax cuts that she promoted benefited large corporate property owners way more than they benefited residents. The huge increases in tax revenues during her mayoral administration weren't enough to fund everything on her wish list, though, so borrowed money was needed, too.

She inherited a city with zero debt,but left it with indebtedness of over $22 million. What did Mayor Palin encourage the voters to borrow money for? Was it the infrastructure that she said she supported? The sewage treatment plant that the city lacked?Or a new library? No. $1 million for a park. $15 million-plus for construction of a multi-use sports complex which she rushed through to build on a piece of property that the City didn't even have clear title to, and that was still in litigation seven years later -- to the delight of the lawyers involved!

The sports complex itself is a nice addition to the community but a huge money pit, not the profit-generator she claimed it would be. She also supported bonds for $5.5 million for road projects that could have been done in 5 to 7 years without any borrowing. While mayor, City Hall was extensively remodeled and her office redecorated more than once.

These are small numbers, but Wasilla is a very small city. As an oil producer, the high price of oil has created a budget surplus in Alaska. Rather than invest this surplus in technology that will make us energy independent and increase efficiency, as Governor she proposed distribution of this surplus to every individual in the state. In this time of record state revenues and budget surpluses, she recommended that the state borrow/bond for road projects, even while she proposed distribution of surplus state revenues: spend today's surplus, borrow for needs.

She's not very tolerant of divergent opinions or open to outside ideas or compromise. As mayor, she fought ideas that weren't generated by her or her staff. Ideas weren't evaluated on their merits, but on the basis of who proposed them. While Sarah was mayor of Wasilla she tried to fire our highly respected City Librarian because the Librarian refused to consider removing from the library some books that Sarah wanted removed. City residents rallied to the defense of the City Librarian and against Palin's attempt at out-and-out censorship, so Palin backed down and withdrew her termination letter. People who fought her attempt to oust the Librarian are on her enemies list to this day.

Sarah complained about the old boy's club when she first ran for mayor, so what did she bring Wasilla? A new set of "good old boys." Palin fired most of the experienced staff she inherited. At the City and as Governor she hired or elevated new, inexperienced, obscure people, creating a staff totally dependent on her for their jobs and eternally grateful and fiercely loyal -- loyal to the point of abusing their power to further her personal agenda, as she has acknowledged happened in the case of pressuring the state's top cop (see below).

As mayor, Sarah fired Wasilla's police chief because he intimidated her, she told the press. As governor, her recent firing of Alaska's top cop has the ring of familiarity about it. He served at her pleasure and she had every legal right to fire him, but it's pretty clear that an important factor in her decision to fire him was because he wouldn't fire her sister's ex-husband, a state trooper. Under investigation for abuse of power, she has had to admit that more than two dozen contacts were made between her staff and family to the person that she later fired, pressuring him to fire her ex-brother-in-law. She tried to replace the man she fired with a man who she knew had been reprimanded for sexual harassment; when this caused a public furor, she withdrew her support. She has bitten the hand of every person who extended theirs to her in help.

The city council person who personally escorted her around town introducing her to voters when she first ran for Wasilla City Council became one of her first targets when she was later elected mayor. She abruptly fired her loyal City Administrator; even people who didn't like the guy were stunned by this ruthlessness. Fear of retribution has kept all of these people from saying anything publicly about her. When then-Governor Murkowski was handing out political plums, Sarah got the best, chair of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission: one of the few jobs not in Juneau and one of the best paid. She had no background in oil and gas issues. Within months of scoring this great job which paid $122,400/year, she was complaining in the press about the high salary.

I was told that she hated that job: the commute, the structured hours, the work. Sarah became aware that a member of this commission (who was also the state chair of the Republican Party) had engaged in unethical behavior on the job. In a gutsy move which some undoubtedly cautioned her could be political suicide, Sarah solved all her problems in one fell swoop: got out of the job she hated and garnered gobs of media attention as the patron saint of ethics and asa gutsy fighter against the old boys club when she dramatically quit, exposing this man's ethics violations (for which he was fined).

As mayor, she had her hand stuck out as far as anyone for pork from Senator Ted Stevens. Lately, she has castigated his pork-barrel politics and publicly humiliated him. She only opposed the bridge to nowhere after it became clear that it would be unwise not to.

As governor, she gave the legislature no direction and budget guidelines, then made a big grandstand display of line-item vetoing projects, calling them pork. Public outcry and further legislative action restored most of these projects -- which had been vetoed simply because she was not aware of their importance -- but with the unobservant she had gained a reputation as anti-pork.

She is solidly Republican: no political maverick. The state party leaders hate her because she has bit them in the back and humiliated them. Other members of the party object to her self-description as a fiscal conservative. Around Wasilla there are people who went to high school with Sarah. They call her Sarah Barracuda because of her unbridled ambition and predatory ruthlessness. Before she became so powerful, very ugly stories circulated around town about shenanigans she pulled to be made point guard on the high school basketball team.

When Sarah's mother-in-law, a highly respected member of the community and experienced manager, ran for mayor, Sarah refused to endorse her. As governor, she stepped outside of the box and put together of package of legislation known as AGIA that forced the oil companies to march to the beat of her drum. Like most Alaskans, she favors drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. She has questioned if the loss of sea ice is linked to global warming. She campaigned as a private citizen against a state initiative that would have either a) protected salmon streams from pollution from mines, or b) tied up in the courts all mining in the state (depending on who you listen to). She has pushed the state's lawsuit against the Dept. of the Interior's decision to list polar bears as threatened species. McCain is the oldest person to ever run for president; Sarah will be a heartbeat away from being president.

There have to be literally millions of Americans who are more knowledgeable and experienced than she. However, there are a lot of people who have underestimated her and are regretting it.

WHY AM I WRITING THIS?

First, I have long believed in the importance of being an informed voter. I am a voter registrar. For 10 years I put on student voting programs in the schools. If you Google my name (Anne Kilkenny +Alaska), you will find references to my participation in local government, education, and PTA/parent organizations.

Second, I've always operated in the belief that "Bad things happen when good people stay silent." Few people know as much as I do because few have gone to as many City Council meetings.

Third, I am just a housewife. I don't have a job she can bump me out of. I don't belong to any organization that she can hurt. But I am no fool; she is immensely popular here, and it is likely that this will cost me somehow in the future: that's life.

Fourth, she has hated me since back in 1996, when I was one of the 100 or so people who rallied to support the City Librarian against Sarah's attempt at censorship.

Fifth, I looked around and realized that everybody else was afraid to say anything because they were somehow vulnerable.

CAVEATS I am not a statistician. I developed the numbers for the increase in spending and taxation two years ago (when Palin was running for governor) from information supplied to me by the finance director of the City of Wasilla, and I can't recall exactly what I adjusted for: did I adjust for inflation? for population increases? Right now, it is impossible for a private person to get any info out of City Hall -- they are swamped. So I can't verify my numbers. You may have noticed that there are various numbers circulating for the population of Wasilla, ranging from my "about 5,000" up to 9,000. The day Palin's selection was announced a city official told me that the current population is about 7,000. The official 2000 census count was 5,460. I have used about 5,000 because Palin was mayor from 1996 to 2002, and the city was growing rapidly in the mid-90s. Anne Kilkennyannekilkenny@hotmail.com August 31, 2008--James F. Villeré Jr. Attorney & Mediator 441 Main Street Metuchen, New Jersey 08840P: 973.267.0787F: 973.944.501 7
Last edited by Greg_Cornish on Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The trouble with quotes on the Internet, is that you can never know if they are genuine." - Abraham Lincoln
Jeff C.
Posts: 565
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 12:03 pm

Re: Meet Sarah by a personal acquaintance

Post by Jeff C. »

I gotta disagree with one point above...

Unlike Sarah, Hillary lost her good looks quite some time ago. :lol:
Greg_Cornish
Posts: 5422
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:37 pm
Location: Clear Lake

Re: Meet Sarah by a personal acquaintance

Post by Greg_Cornish »

Jeff C. wrote:I gotta disagree with one point above...

Unlike Sarah, Hillary lost her good looks quite some time ago. :lol:
I think it was those last 2 years in the white house.
"The trouble with quotes on the Internet, is that you can never know if they are genuine." - Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
getalife
Posts: 431
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Santa Rosa

Re: Meet Sarah by a personal acquaintance

Post by getalife »

At last, Jeff and I can agree on something.
CHANGE is not a destination, and HOPE is not a strategy!
User avatar
Marty
Posts: 4333
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 8:04 pm
Location: Delta
Contact:

Re: Meet Sarah by a personal acquaintance

Post by Marty »

You guys must be blind – Hillary wolf ugly and this is not about being on the right or left!
Image
User avatar
StockOption
Posts: 1900
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 6:29 pm

Re: Meet Sarah by a personal acquaintance

Post by StockOption »

What's next here, references to articles on the DailyKos?

The viral e-mail posted about Sarah above basically began from an article on the Washington Independent site. A site owned and operated by known leftist organization Center for Independent Media. The Center is an organization founded in 2006 (gee...just in time for this election) with distinct ties to Media Matters an organization Hillary claims to have started and has said so publicly.

C'mon don't let them fool you that easily ;)

I love the tag line on the Washington Independent: "National News In Context". Yeah, in liberal context.

LOL

I hope you can understand why one might question the veracity and honesty of this viral mail.
Kurt
User avatar
Marty
Posts: 4333
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 8:04 pm
Location: Delta
Contact:

Re: Meet Sarah by a personal acquaintance

Post by Marty »

Outstanding
Image
Greg_Cornish
Posts: 5422
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:37 pm
Location: Clear Lake

Re: Meet Sarah by a personal acquaintance

Post by Greg_Cornish »

StockOption wrote:The viral e-mail posted about Sarah above basically began from an article on the Washington Independent site. A site owned and operated by known leftist organization Center for Independent Media. The Center is an organization founded in 2006 (gee...just in time for this election) with distinct ties to Media Matters an organization Hillary claims to have started and has said so publicly.
LOL Well maybe you thought McCain would expose her? The religious right. Whew!

My bet is that the opposition would bring this truth to light. If it's a lie it will easily be disproven right? They'll prove that no-one demonstrated against her removing books from libraries. They prove that the city has no large deficit. If they prove it I'll believe it.
"The trouble with quotes on the Internet, is that you can never know if they are genuine." - Abraham Lincoln
smittyfish
Posts: 329
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 7:04 pm

Re: Meet Sarah by a personal acquaintance

Post by smittyfish »

That letter sounded a lot like "fair and balanced" media to me.......lol
User avatar
Guyle
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:37 am
Location: Delta

Re: Meet Sarah by a personal acquaintance

Post by Guyle »

I just read through it quickly but did not see mention od the thousands of dollars that were given back to the Alaskan residents from oil. I gues it was written by some ugly jealous liberal.
User avatar
FishaHallic
Posts: 783
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:23 pm
Location: Reno, NV

Re: Meet Sarah by a personal acquaintance

Post by FishaHallic »

Guyle wrote:I just read through it quickly but did not see mention od the thousands of dollars that were given back to the Alaskan residents from oil. I gues it was written by some ugly jealous liberal.
That has nothing to do with Sarah Pallin.
Florida transplant, miss my Bass fishing
Greg_Cornish
Posts: 5422
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:37 pm
Location: Clear Lake

Re: Meet Sarah by a personal acquaintance

Post by Greg_Cornish »

Guyle wrote:I just read through it quickly but did not see mention od the thousands of dollars that were given back to the Alaskan residents from oil. I gues it was written by some ugly jealous liberal.
Let me help you with that.

"As an oil producer, the high price of oil has created a budget surplus in Alaska. Rather than invest this surplus in technology that will make us energy independent and increase efficiency, as Governor she proposed distribution of this surplus to every individual in the state. In this time of record state revenues and budget surpluses, she recommended that the state borrow/bond for road projects, even while she proposed distribution of surplus state revenues: spend today's surplus, borrow for needs. "
"The trouble with quotes on the Internet, is that you can never know if they are genuine." - Abraham Lincoln
smittyfish
Posts: 329
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 7:04 pm

Re: Meet Sarah by a personal acquaintance

Post by smittyfish »

Greg,

Thank you for pointing out the obvious. The right wingers only see and hear what they want to believe.
User avatar
Rob D
Posts: 124
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 6:25 am
Location: Roseburg, OR

Re: Meet Sarah by a personal acquaintance

Post by Rob D »

"CAVEATS I am not a statistician. I developed the numbers for the increase in spending and taxation two years ago (when Palin was running for governor) from information supplied to me by the finance director of the City of Wasilla, and I can't recall exactly what I adjusted for: did I adjust for inflation? for population increases? Right now, it is impossible for a private person to get any info out of City Hall -- they are swamped. So I can't verify my numbers. You may have noticed that there are various numbers circulating for the population of Wasilla, ranging from my "about 5,000" up to 9,000. The day Palin's selection was announced a city official told me that the current population is about 7,000. The official 2000 census count was 5,460. I have used about 5,000 because Palin was mayor from 1996 to 2002, and the city was growing rapidly in the mid-90s. Anne Kilkennyannekilkenny@hotmail.com August 31, 2008--James F. Villeré Jr. Attorney & Mediator 441 Main Street Metuchen, New Jersey 08840P: 973.267.0787F: 973.944.501 7"
The last paragraph is the disclaimer, where she doesn't remember how she came up with these numbers and says there is no way for anyone else to verify or substantiate these numbers. Sounds like somebody "Swiftboating" Palin. How convenient that the numbers can not be verified.
I fish because I CAN!!
God Bless America!!
Rob Douglas
Greg_Cornish
Posts: 5422
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:37 pm
Location: Clear Lake

Re: Meet Sarah by a personal acquaintance

Post by Greg_Cornish »

One thing I haven't seem is a list of the books that she wanted banned. I've googled and googled and found lists, but the lists have been proven bogus.

I wonder why media hasn't followed up on this. I've found that there was a demonstration and ruckus about it but never a list.
"The trouble with quotes on the Internet, is that you can never know if they are genuine." - Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
MikeD
Posts: 1089
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 11:30 am
Location: Sonora, CA

Re: Meet Sarah by a personal acquaintance

Post by MikeD »

Rob D wrote:The last paragraph is the disclaimer, where she doesn't remember how she came up with these numbers and says there is no way for anyone else to verify or substantiate these numbers. Sounds like somebody "Swiftboating" Palin. How convenient that the numbers can not be verified.
negative - I don't see that she said that anywhere in the text. put your glasses on and read it again. she states that it is her opinion that it would be "impossible" to get numbers given workload. but you can make the call to the City Hall like any other citizen and get them for yourself with enough persistence. me thinks you doth protest too much.

what numbers do you think should be verified?

swiftboating? please... one persons opinion that she is entitled to, at least its based on direct, involved, personal experience - what personal experience do you have to contradict her?
"I'll just drop it on their head, and then rip their lips off with a TV hookset..." <i>unnamed angler when discussing how he fishes a jig</i>
User avatar
Marty
Posts: 4333
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 8:04 pm
Location: Delta
Contact:

Re: Meet Sarah by a personal acquaintance

Post by Marty »

Hey Mike glad to see you come on down to the basement! Ok guys Mike will give you a real good debate without calling you a name!
Image
User avatar
getalife
Posts: 431
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Santa Rosa

Re: Meet Sarah by a personal acquaintance

Post by getalife »

GREG... knock it off! You are making me dizzy!
CHANGE is not a destination, and HOPE is not a strategy!
User avatar
Rob D
Posts: 124
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 6:25 am
Location: Roseburg, OR

Re: Meet Sarah by a personal acquaintance

Post by Rob D »

MikeD wrote:
Rob D wrote:The last paragraph is the disclaimer, where she doesn't remember how she came up with these numbers and says there is no way for anyone else to verify or substantiate these numbers. Sounds like somebody "Swiftboating" Palin. How convenient that the numbers can not be verified.
negative - I don't see that she said that anywhere in the text. put your glasses on and read it again. she states that it is her opinion that it would be "impossible" to get numbers given workload. but you can make the call to the City Hall like any other citizen and get them for yourself with enough persistence. me thinks you doth protest too much.

what numbers do you think should be verified?

swiftboating? please... one persons opinion that she is entitled to, at least its based on direct, involved, personal experience - what personal experience do you have to contradict her?
I did read the last paragraph, with my glasses on, I even included it in my post, but I'll bolden the words I'm talking about this time.
I am not a statistician. I developed the numbers for the increase in spending and taxation two years ago (when Palin was running for governor) from information supplied to me by the finance director of the City of Wasilla, and I can't recall exactly what I adjusted for: did I adjust for inflation? for population increases? Right now, it is impossible for a private person to get any info out of City Hall -- they are swamped. So I can't verify my numbers. You may have noticed that there are various numbers circulating for the population of Wasilla, ranging from my "about 5,000" up to 9,000. The day Palin's selection was announced a city official told me that the current population is about 7,000. The official 2000 census count was 5,460. I have used about 5,000 because Palin was mayor from 1996 to 2002, and the city was growing rapidly in the mid-90s.
Giving information as fact, without a source that can be verified, that sounds like swiftboating to me. I am not contradicting it, just pointing out that all those numbers without a source to back them up is nothing but a rumor or one persons opinion and should be viewed as an editorial not factual comment.
I fish because I CAN!!
God Bless America!!
Rob Douglas
Greg_Cornish
Posts: 5422
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:37 pm
Location: Clear Lake

Re: Meet Sarah by a personal acquaintance

Post by Greg_Cornish »

Rob D wrote:Giving information as fact, without a source that can be verified, that sounds like swiftboating to me. I am not contradicting it, just pointing out that all those numbers without a source to back them up is nothing but a rumor or one persons opinion and should be viewed as an editorial not factual comment.
Darned amateurs.
"The trouble with quotes on the Internet, is that you can never know if they are genuine." - Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
MikeD
Posts: 1089
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 11:30 am
Location: Sonora, CA

Re: Meet Sarah by a personal acquaintance

Post by MikeD »

man, you do paint with a very broad brush, I'll learn to keep that in mind when reading your relies going fwd, almost a hysteria in your writing style - that's not a dig at all but I can understand how you might take it that way but please don't, it's not intended that way.

In no way did I read the article as fact and I doubt greatly that this was intended to be presented as fact, I certainly didn't read it as that, but it's interesting that you did. I read it as one persons opinion. The numbers are verifiable should you chose to put the effort forth to do so by contacting the finance director of the City of Wasilla as she took the time to do so a few years back, it's not like they were pulled from the neither regions of her bloomers. She stated where they came from and acknowledged that she made some adjustments for various things that she couldnt recall - but you only seem to take exception to the fact that the numbers were somehow adjusted, as though the numbers themselves were the point and now that she cant account specifically for each and every detail that somehow all of her narrative becomes one big untruth. I'm willing to read her narrative, consider her experience and formulate a takeaway on what I read.

2nd time you've referenced 'swiftboating' as a verb. interesting, clearly you sit close to the radio - Rush, Hannity, or is there someone else that you regularly listen to?

She notes that she is not a statistician - but personally I'd think that this is better suited to an accounting background and not a statistician. just because *she* can't verify the numbers (my thought is that her inability to verify is due more to lack of time/interest than lack of capability) doesn't mean that there is no human left on the face of the earth that could do it - I'd imagine that it's within the skill set of the average accountant to be able to come up with any level of reporting that might satisfy you.

- i disagree that the article it was given as fact
- i noted the source for you above
- i don't think that because somehow the exact P&L statement with some sort of auditing notarization is missing negates her entire direct experience
- i'm not exactly sure how you are using the verb swiftboating in this situation to describe one persons narrating their own direct experience and opinion - are people not entitled to share their opinio based on personal experiences since it somehow seems to not be in line with your desire to have her seen in a higher standard?
"I'll just drop it on their head, and then rip their lips off with a TV hookset..." <i>unnamed angler when discussing how he fishes a jig</i>
Post Reply