Sarah

For political discussions
Post Reply
User avatar
Marty
Posts: 4333
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 8:04 pm
Location: Delta
Contact:

Sarah

Post by Marty »

Talk about being closed-minded!

What is it about this woman that drives Dan McKenzie, Swank, Biteme, Greg Cornish and other liberals nuts? She’s no longer in office, has no regular influence beyond her million-strong supporters, has not announced plans to seek public office, and yet it’s considered normal for liberal comediennes to joke about gang-raping her (http://www.mererhetoric.com/archives/11274873.html) or another late night liberal show host telling jokes about her daughter (Greg already posted that link). These four give more respect to the terrorists by not specking up on the move to New York for a fair trial – like a military trial is not fair? You four think she is uneducated back woods woman when in fact she has more then the four of you put together, you four are embarrassing.

These individuals (Dan McKenzie, Swank, Biteme and Greg Cornish) have become so consumed with loathing for a woman they never met, spoken to, or indeed communicated with in any way, in fact have not even read her book. A book that is a best seller even before being release. The type of woman they support are more like Barbara Boxer, Dianne Feinstein, and Hilary Clinton who have wrote books that were not best seller even after being released. I would have add Pelosi but I don’t Greg going off subject defending himself that he does not like Pelosi.

There’s something about Sarah which drives the left batty. They will tell you that it’s her political positions, I think it has more to do with who and what she is. She’s an attractive, female, pro-life, pro-gun, anti-tax woman, who made it the whole way to a national presidential ticket without the need of affirmative action laws. She’s an existential threat to the left. The Democrats know they don’t win elections without a 10-20 point majority of women. A successful female candidate would win any Presidential Election in a landslide. And so she had to be taken out. The Democrats War on Sarah.

It should be pointed out that the next election is a long way off. Feelings, moods, views, ideas, and ideals can all change between now and then. Her polling is not great, and her image may be indelibly locked into the minds of the public. On the other hand, does anybody know of any other politician, outside of President Obama, who could get 1,500 people to stand at 4am in temperatures of minus 6 just for an autograph book?

As it stands now Sarah’s Facebook page has passed one million friends (I know because I’m one of them along of a lot of other Bass anglers that we all know). One million supporters three years before an election is a major number. In fact, “by political standards, one million voters who have declared you as their candidate within the first week of a person throwing their hat into the race is considered to be significant. Without going in to all of the math, just figure that there is an expected rate of increase as the months go on during an election season. Declared voters for a candidate are usually expected to increase to at least 45 times the original amount that declared the candidate. Today, we are talking about Sarah’ one million Facebook friends. Next year, we might be talking about ten million.â€
Image
2ndsuks
Posts: 878
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: Sarah

Post by 2ndsuks »

FEAR!
biteme
Posts: 2479
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:01 am

Re: Sarah

Post by biteme »

Marty, like I told you when we were fishing. I hope she does run, I really do. I dont know where you get the idea of being fearful from. Keep telling yourself that.
:lol:
biteme
Posts: 2479
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:01 am

Re: Sarah

Post by biteme »

These individuals (Dan McKenzie, Swank, Biteme and Greg Cornish) have become so consumed with loathing for a woman they never met, spoken to, or indeed communicated with in any way, in fact have not even read her book.
I like this part "consumed" , HAHAHAHAHA. Boy you are twisting things just a bit eh?
For some reason it seems to me like you are looking for ways to talk about her. :wink:
swank
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:36 am
Location: west L.A.

Re: Sarah

Post by swank »

Bring her on! You can't be serious to think that were intimidated by palin.
She's like watching the boss Michael on the office, you can't take your eyes off them because you can't wait to see what dumb crap they say next. So we'll take all the independents and middle of the road folks, you can have all the religious nut cases. We are scared -- scared that a fellow american can be so blinded by beauty (like a sexy librarian). If your team didn't pick up that rock they found her under, you guys would have had your grandpa president (it really showed his awesome decision-making abilities).
Ringer
Posts: 995
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Sarah

Post by Ringer »

She will never run the country but I bet she will have a few dozen notches in her pistol grip after the mid term elections. She is flawed but that is the attraction to her by middle America. She is just like most average Americans and we are not the sharpest pencils in the drawer. She will raise a ton of money for critical races and the democrats will lose control of congress. Anyone want to bet that Pelosi will not be speaker after next fall?
Dan McKenzie
Posts: 1220
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 5:57 pm

Re: Sarah

Post by Dan McKenzie »

eye dee ten tee
zues
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 8:06 am
Location: vacaville,ca

Re: Sarah

Post by zues »

Ringer wrote:She is flawed but that is the attraction to her by middle America. She is just like most average Americans and we are not the sharpest pencils in the drawer. She will raise a ton of money for critical races and the democrats will lose control of congress. Anyone want to bet that Pelosi will not be speaker after next fall?

You bring up a couple interesting points here: she is liked by middle america, BECAUSE of her flaws. That may be part of the attraction for sure. She's also sassy, a plain talker, and not very polished, all of which endeer her to many. I agree, she'll never run the country, but she can and most likely will be part of the next elections of 10 and 12. Your comment on most Americans not being the sharpest pencil; one would think, that they would be tired of politicians, or media, that treat them that way, and act as if they know best. Yet, we keep voting in the Pelosis and Boxers.....maybe we just ain't that smart. Pelosi most likely won't be speaker, next year, she will be in congress though.....and the damage done by her and George Miller, passing the power grab, they are referring as a health care bill, has already been done.
my racing is a sickness, my fishiing is a passion, thank god my wife likes both!!
896J
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 12:09 pm
Location: Manteca

Re: Sarah

Post by 896J »

I haven't paid a lot of attention to what she says and don't know her ideas, philosophies and such. For some reason, when I watch her on TV I kinda zone out and simply watch and hear nothing :wink: .
Greg_Cornish
Posts: 5422
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:37 pm
Location: Clear Lake

Re: Sarah

Post by Greg_Cornish »

zues wrote:You bring up a couple interesting points here: she is liked by middle america, BECAUSE of her flaws. That may be part of the attraction for sure. She's also sassy, a plain talker, and not very polished, all of which endeer her to many. I agree, she'll never run the country, but she can and most likely will be part of the next elections of 10 and 12.
It scares me because I saw it happen before. This is the kind of thinking that got us Bush for 8 years. "I like him cuz he's kinda dumb like us." If you can convince the majority of that you might have a winner.

Sorry man, I want someone with a education that did well in school. We dealing cards on the world stage here. I don't want someone who can only learn to pay "Go Fish".

Palin on Foreign policy (short ad first) Hmm, I served in the Military in Alaska for 2 years, so I'm even more qualified in foreign policy than her.
User avatar
Marty
Posts: 4333
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 8:04 pm
Location: Delta
Contact:

Re: Sarah

Post by Marty »

Greg_Cornish wrote:It scares me because I saw it happen before. This is the kind of thinking that got us Bush for 8 years. "I like him cuz he's kinda dumb like us." If you can convince the majority of that you might have a winner.

Sorry man, I want someone with a education that did well in school. We dealing cards on the world stage here. I don't want someone who can only learn to pay "Go Fish".

Palin on Foreign policy, I served in the Military in Alaska for 2 years, so I'm even more qualified in foreign policy than her.
You stated BHO as “being one of the best at Harvardâ€
Image
2ndsuks
Posts: 878
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: Sarah

Post by 2ndsuks »

And Obama ran ACORN. :lol:
Dan McKenzie
Posts: 1220
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 5:57 pm

Re: Sarah

Post by Dan McKenzie »

Bush didn't have ANY foreign, or domestic policy for that matter. So the mere fact that Obama has sat down with the worlds leaders is a major feat in and of itself. I like how you ride the fence here, stating "I was never much on Bush" ha ha. Just how is you see Obama got bent over? The fact that we are talking beats the last administrations "head in the sand" tactics.

Now I told you before, leave my name out of your posts. You can take this any way you like, don't type my name into one of your posts again or you and I are going to have a BIG problem.
Ringer
Posts: 995
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Sarah

Post by Ringer »

Obama had zero foreign policy experience as well. He is very well educated and look what he has done so far. If he would just fire Rob Emmanuel and the other Chicago dirtbags and get a new financial group he would look a lot smarter. He should clean house and tell the new financial group to give massive tax breaks to any corporation that will move manufacturing back to American soil. Create jobs without trade embargos and grow the middle class so they can pay taxes. He might be well educated but I haven't seen much in the smart department.
User avatar
StockOption
Posts: 1900
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 6:29 pm

Re: Sarah

Post by StockOption »

Dan McKenzie wrote:So the mere fact that Obama has sat down with the worlds leaders is a major feat in and of itself.
Wow. I've heard of low expectations before but this statement takes that standard even lower.

The incompetent is an excellent bower and an even better apologist. Too bad he's not a leader, we could really use one.

LOL
Kurt
Greg_Cornish
Posts: 5422
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:37 pm
Location: Clear Lake

Re: Sarah

Post by Greg_Cornish »

Haha, I love Terry Venturas quote on facebook

"I did some fear and loathing early this morning with CNN trying to understand the fascination with Ms Palin! The republican party's version of celebrity reminds me of Anna Nicole Smith minus the boobs (sure to come) and drugs (that'll happen too)"

This is pretty good too.
User avatar
Marty
Posts: 4333
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 8:04 pm
Location: Delta
Contact:

Re: Sarah

Post by Marty »

Dan McKenzie wrote: Now I told you before, leave my name out of your posts. You can take this any way you like, don't type my name into one of your posts again or you and I are going to have a BIG problem.
Woo a threat, bring on you big problem (I'm an Old man you can take me) and if you don't want you name used stop posting!
Image
Greg_Cornish
Posts: 5422
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:37 pm
Location: Clear Lake

Re: Sarah

Post by Greg_Cornish »

Marty wrote:So by you serving in the Military in Alaska for 2 years make you even more qualified in foreign policy than her? Greg here is other dumb a@@ statement you made.
I know, It's because I was using conservative's logic. Ironic huh?
User avatar
Marty
Posts: 4333
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 8:04 pm
Location: Delta
Contact:

Re: Sarah

Post by Marty »

Greg_Cornish wrote:I know, It's because I was using conservative's logic. Ironic huh?

LOL, you do make me laugh
Image
Greg_Cornish
Posts: 5422
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:37 pm
Location: Clear Lake

Re: Sarah

Post by Greg_Cornish »

:D
Vince E
Posts: 1464
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:58 am
Location: Chico

Re: Sarah

Post by Vince E »

I don't know why anyone should be too concerned about who might run and who might not.

If voting could actually change anything they would make it illegal.
The great non sequitur committed by defenders of the State, including classical Aristotelian and Thomist philosophers, is to leap from the necessity of society to the necessity of the State.
long rifle
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 6:35 pm

Re: Sarah

Post by long rifle »

Marty has a lot to read(after having a few drinks like a good Marine would do on a Saturday), all I saw was Palin blah blah blah Greg you freakin lib blah blah. That was a nough. All I can say is have you seen her on the cover of Newsweek? OMG HOT! I will vote for her again.
If you can read thank a teacher. If you can read in english, thank a Marine.
angler2020
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 5:40 pm

Re: Sarah

Post by angler2020 »

Kind of sad that people are so unaware of why Sarah had to resign from being governor. Sarah had a huge legal bill. She set up a fund while governor, so people would donate money to her to help pay her legal bills. Well it turns out this is an ethics violation. She deserves to be in jail for this.

Sarah isn't to bright when it comes to speaking in public. As Stephen Colbert duly noted, the true fault of the Couric interview was turning the microphone on.

Here is a source for all the skeptics.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/ju ... -violation
"The fund aims to help Palin pay off debts stemming from multiple ethics complaints against her, most of which have been dismissed. Palin says she owes more than $500,000 (£304,000) in legal fees, and she cited the mounting toll of the ethics probes as one of the reasons she is leaving office."

Do you like how the article says most of all the complaints have been dismissed? It doesn't say all. LOL.

Why would anyone vote for a quitter?
Greg_Cornish
Posts: 5422
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:37 pm
Location: Clear Lake

Re: Sarah

Post by Greg_Cornish »

Here's a better news source than Fox.

http://conservativesarecommunistss.blogspot.com/

I might by the book and read it just for kicks. Right after I get through reading Jesse Ventura's books which were also best sellers.
User avatar
Marty
Posts: 4333
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 8:04 pm
Location: Delta
Contact:

Re: Sarah

Post by Marty »

Greg_Cornish wrote:Here's a better news source than Fox.

http://conservativesarecommunistss.blogspot.com/

I might by the book and read it just for kicks. Right after I get through reading Jesse Ventura's books which were also best sellers.
That was a real good article Greg, I read it from left to right enjoying every word! Some of Frank Rich phases brought a real smile to my face.

Like stating Sarah has an outsized ego, that is a true statement – what person that seeks public office does not, that is one of the requirements! Stating the obvious!

Then he said that Sarah is “pit bull in the china shop of American politicsâ€
Image
Greg_Cornish
Posts: 5422
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:37 pm
Location: Clear Lake

Re: Sarah

Post by Greg_Cornish »

Marty

ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Marty
Posts: 4333
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 8:04 pm
Location: Delta
Contact:

Re: Sarah

Post by Marty »

Greg_Cornish wrote:Marty

ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
That is your literary answers, your talismanic response – dropping your pants like you’re in SF, No funny come back, No liberal truths - again I’m laughing my @ss off.
Image
Post Reply