I'm amazed at the numbers of wins, winnings, and dead fish!

I also weighed fish for Mike Hart alone, and Hart and Zank as a team, over the last three or four years, and can't remember a dead fish.Brian Linehan wrote:In the 7 events I ran in which he fished last year, he didn't weigh 1 dead fish so I'm assume the stat you saw is a typo.
They didn't find the weights in his day one fish, do you think he didn't use them on that day?mark poulson wrote:I also weighed fish for Mike Hart alone, and Hart and Zank as a team, over the last three or four years, and can't remember a dead fish.Brian Linehan wrote:In the 7 events I ran in which he fished last year, he didn't weigh 1 dead fish so I'm assume the stat you saw is a typo.
There may have been one, but certainly not one out of four.
Almost all our tournament's dead fish were taken home and eaten by a staff member, so we would have heard pretty quickly if there had been weights in any of them.
It has to be a typo.
That kind of hits the nail on top of the head with this whole affair Rick, the dude was a supreme stick and he didn't need to cheat. This washes away what should have been a stellar career, that anyone of us would have more than proud of. That's why it's sad in a way. What would have been more than enough for 99.99% of us just wasn't good enough for him... It's just a shame...Rick G wrote:The main reason there were no red flags is that lots of people watched him and his partners catch the winning bags. He and his past partners were and still are very good sticks and weights or no weights they still had to put them in the boat. That sounds like alot of dead fish to me and must be a mistake. Rick G.
I would never take that bet, simply cause you guys never caught that many fish last year! HAR! HAR! HAR!g-man wrote:The dead fish ratio is ridiculous, I'd bet in the last three years me, and my buds (30 plus) didn't weigh that many dead fish combined!
Now that's funnyCooch wrote:I would never take that bet, simply cause you guys never caught that many fish last year! HAR! HAR! HAR!g-man wrote:The dead fish ratio is ridiculous, I'd bet in the last three years me, and my buds (30 plus) didn't weigh that many dead fish combined!
I did just fine...Cooch wrote:I would never take that bet, simply cause you guys never caught that many fish last year! HAR! HAR! HAR!g-man wrote:The dead fish ratio is ridiculous, I'd bet in the last three years me, and my buds (30 plus) didn't weigh that many dead fish combined!
Us too!!! think we have only had 1 dead fish in 5 yearsg-man wrote:I did just fine...Cooch wrote:I would never take that bet, simply cause you guys never caught that many fish last year! HAR! HAR! HAR!g-man wrote:The dead fish ratio is ridiculous, I'd bet in the last three years me, and my buds (30 plus) didn't weigh that many dead fish combined!