swimbait wrote:Cooch - Like you I was kinda over the idea of a 1 in 3 payback. For me it's all selfish right, because the way Nico and I fish we either suck and come in last place or we win. There's not a lot of in between, so who cares what 8th place pays right? I'd imagine you have the same view on things?
But thinking on it more I'm open to giving 1 in 3 payback a chance because if you draw another 15 or 20 guys, the first place payback will probably be the same as it was before. Could be a nice win-win kind of thing where the payback goes deeper but the top stays the same. Just speculating!
We're on the same page Rob. Swing for the fence or go back to the dug out and wait for that next at bat. That has always been my approach since I moved up from fishing club events and the old Hook tournaments in the early 90s. If I'm not tryin to win it everytime, mentally, I ain't headed in the right direction, why am I even there? Ya win a few, ya lose more, no one is gonna win em all, that's an accepted fact for me. It's not a formula that works for everyone, but I'm content with it.
As far as the payback thing, to me it's a big "IF". When ya already have something in place, and yer numbers are growing as it is, why mess with the "if' factor. Ya only open another "what if" door, what if yer numbers don't grow? Or, what if yer numbers do grow, and it had nothing to do with the change? Those guys were coming anyhow because they see larger fields, a growing circuit and a TD the anglers are happy with and support, they had no idea the payback changed, much less got drift of the pros & cons.
The brass at ABA made these decision on their own. They polled their TDs, and made the changes. They did not contact and poll their customer base. That in itself, I think was a bad move too. With all that said, my choice to not fish in this season's ABA team Delta Region is purty simple. I do wish Rodger the best, hopefully our debate here this week, has garnered interest and overloaded his field today!