Grumpy wrote:Vince E wrote:The woman's an idiot. She has much in common with our current POTUS. Neither of them could understand or articulate anything outside of partisan pre-packed rhetorical sound bytes and they need cliff notes to even get that right.
Not one of them truly understands economics and how it and the "market" are the very essence of the latticework of all human choices in the face of scarcity. The only thing they understand about the central banks are that they are to follow their orders to the letter and neither would challenge them in any way that had a chance of anything but actually giving the figures behind them even more power.
The only difference between them is one pretends to be for the poor and one pretends for small govt.
They both are pwned by the MIC, the Fed, the IMF/world bank, the pharma biz and the energy monopoly.
If anyone votes anyone but Ron Paul you are a fool, not that he could really change much when the rest of govt is pwned by the same people, but at least it makes them nervous.
Feel free to vote for the warmongering neo-con or socialist of your choice after the primary but do the right thing and shake the F##ckers up in the first round and spread the message: NO MORE PHONEY MONEY, NO MORE PROMISES PAID FOR WITH IT!
Not a big Palin fan although I believe she would be much better for the country than what we got. I disagree with most of what you say because Ron Paul is unelectable for several reasons. Nominating a Ron Paul insures progressive liberals remain in power.
The country needs to get back to what made it great. Western capitalism unchained. Its not perfect but its the best the world has ever seen. The way to get there may not be clear but its not through Ron Paul at this time.
I wholly agree and no republican is interested in the "unchained" part of the no matter how much they look you in the face and lie to you.
The monetary system monopoly is the very root of all corperatist/govt/fascist chains.
Socialist ones too and truth be told they are ALL socialists, no matter how they rail against it. Does anyone think the Pentagon is NOT a socialist institution by definition? Oh, but we need a LITTLE socialism right?
How many other then RP have addressed the business cycle, the boom and bust brought by it, the redistribution of wealth that begins with the first recipeients of new money spending at current value and the last recipeints, or those who NEVER rise with inflation, spending at the newly discounted rates through inflation?
Who gets the new money every time? Who is the most likely nevr to see a cost of living increase, or at least not for a long time after prices have been rising?
That is the most evil type of sureptcious thft through secret taxation ever divised by mankind. And no one will admit it, well, almost no one.
And most don't even understand it in the first place. Great chioces for leadership....insider liars or economic ignoramouses.
He won't win a general but by his gaining an increasing share of the primary it puts pressure on neo-cons to actually consider following through on what they have promised but never delivered on for decades.
Like I said, vote for the neo-con of your choice in the general, just put some heat on what is expected of them by rattling thier cozy boys club by voting RP in the primary.
The great non sequitur committed by defenders of the State, including classical Aristotelian and Thomist philosophers, is to leap from the necessity of society to the necessity of the State.
Advertising