Well yes, I can answer that - Professor Jyrki Kauppinen, summed up his conclusions regarding the potential for man-made global warming: “I think it is such a blatant falsification.” Only scam artists, like Gore and Obama, acting in concert with government, to include Jerry Brown as in AB 32 for instance, still believe the world is flat. These folks are in the whacko movement to either make money or to control your life. Maybe Democrats should eat a corndog.

Study Discredits Global Warming, AB 32
SEPT. 7, 2011
By CHRISS STREET
Nature Journal of Science, ranked as the world’s most-cited scientific periodical, just published the definitive study on Global Warming. It proves the dominant controller of temperatures in the earth’s atmosphere is galactic cosmic rays and the sun, rather than man. These “settled science” results should serve as a basis for Californians to overturn the state’s radical and now wrong environmental legislation, AB 32, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006.
As one of the report’s researchers, Professor Jyrki Kauppinen, summed up his conclusions regarding the potential for man-made global warming: “I think it is such a blatant falsification.”
The research was conducted by CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, which invented the World Wide Web, built the multi-billion-dollar Large Hadron Collider, and now has constructed a pristinely clean stainless steel chamber that precisely recreates the earth’s atmosphere. The climate study involved scientists representing 17 of Europe’s and America’s premiere research institutes.
The results demonstrate that cosmic rays promote the formation of molecules that can grow and seed clouds in the earth’s atmosphere; the temperatures then fall as the density of the clouds increases. Because the sun’s magnetic field controls how many cosmic rays reach the earth’s atmosphere, the sun determines the temperature on earth.
Nature Journal has been the holy grail of scientific research publication since it was established in England in 1869. Its original editors gave the title to their new scientific journal in celebration of a line by British poet William Wordsworth: “To the solid ground of nature trusts the Mind that builds for aye.”
Because research scientists are the primary audience of this most prestigious of journals, the magazine strives to retain its stamp of approval as the pinnacle of scientific credibility for original research. Nature first introduced its readers to X-rays, the DNA double helix, the wave nature of particles, pulsars and, more recently, the mapping of the human genome.
Climategate
But Nature’s reputation suffered a huge black eye on November 21, 2009. A hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit and released 1,079 emails and 72 documents exposing willful fraud in several scientific papers published in Nature that supported Al Gore’s theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming. CRU houses the world’s most extensive data base on atmospheric temperatures. The emails exposed blatant exaggerations of the warming data, possible illegal destruction of evidence and a conspiracy to manipulate or suppress data not supporting of the man-made global-warming theory. One email described tricks used supporting anthropogenics in a major Nature article:
“I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.”
As the Wall Street Journal and other conservative media hyper-ventilated over the hacker leaks, they referred to as the “Climategate Scandal.”
Nature quickly retaliated in defense of anthropogenic global warming with a scathing editorial, “Climatologists Under Pressure,” stating:
“Stolen e-mails have revealed no scientific conspiracy, but do highlight ways in which climate researchers could be better supported in the face of public scrutiny.”
The editorial skewered academic doubters of man-made global warming as the “climate-change-denialist fringe.” And in a shocking Freudian slip, the Nature editorial roared its political partisanship:
“This paranoid interpretation would be laughable were it not for the fact that obstructionist politicians in the US Senate will probably use it next year as an excuse to stiffen their opposition to the country’s much needed climate bill. Nothing in the e-mails undermines the scientific case that global warming is real — or that human activities are almost certainly the cause.”
Nature Backtracks
For Nature now to publish research that eviscerates the anthropogenics theory heralds a tectonic rejection by academia of support for the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The U.N. protocol requires every nation on earth to reduce its atmospheric emissions of greenhouse gas to 94.8 percent of 1990 levels to “prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.” The U.S. Senate legislation that Nature sought to stridently lobby for is named “America’s Climate Security Act of 2007”; it’s commonly known as the Cap-and-Trade Bill.
The Heritage Foundation estimated that the costs of complying with Cap-and-Trade would include: a 29 percent increase in the price of gasoline, the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs and reductions of $1.7 to $4.8 trillion of the U.S. GDP by 2030.
Furthermore, Cap-and-Trade would set up a gargantuan intergovernmental bureaucracy that would likely ban natural gas fracking, the steam injection of tar sands and surface coal mining for exploration and the development of America’s immense energy reserves.
After 20 years of academic supremacy and hundreds of billions of dollars of costs, the anthropogenic global warming theory seems headed for the dustbin of history. Perhaps the admirable action of the Nature Journal of Science to place scientific integrity above partisan politics will be a valuable lesson for the scientific community in the future.
But don’t expect California liberals to abandon their collectivist integrity for mere scientific conclusions.
http://www.calwatchdog.com/2011/09/07/22086/