Ron Paul not electable?
-
Greg_Cornish
- Posts: 5422
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:37 pm
- Location: Clear Lake
Ron Paul not electable?
"The trouble with quotes on the Internet, is that you can never know if they are genuine." - Abraham Lincoln
Re: Ron Paul not electable?
I believe the majority of Ron Paul supports are dejected voters of Obama’s hope and change, Point in case Greg. Ron Paul is the “Utopia of the Right” that is pushing an economy policy that relies on a honest society for enforcement. Even worst then his economy policy is his foreign policy. Here is a man that truly believes that the United States had something to do with 911 and we when into Iraq for the oil.
“Ron Paul “is living in the 20s,” and “thinks we can have a moat around the United States and if we ignore the world, the world will ignore us.” Ron Paul never speaks of America as being good but instead, he starts with a false premise – that the United States is a warmongering imperial power bent on conquest for fun and profit (that sounds the same as the Liberals say of America). Listening to Ron Paul, one gets the impression that all conservatives want to do is go to war for the sake of killing innocent people and building an American Empire. But he comes back and tells everyone he is the most conservative of all of the candidates but in fact his speeches are frequently littered with references to “empire” and imperial conquest.”
“The United States is a global superpower and that is a fact, whether Ron Paul and his supporters like it or not, and the United States has global responsibilities. Some of those responsibilities include use of the military. But how would he negotiate with a regime that has called for the extinction of the United States and America’s best ally in the Middle East? Would Ron Paul beg for our lives? Would Ron Paul promise tribute or land in exchange for peace? Appeasement like that has never worked, and it never will. He certainly would not negotiate from a position of strength, as he has repeatedly blamed America for the actions Iran has taken.”
“According to Ron Paul, anyone who wants to ensure a strong national defense in the face of stated threats is a “warmonger” and anyone concerned over Iran’s stated desire to acquire a nuclear device is engaging in “propaganda” for the sole purpose of going to war. Just look at the last few post of Greg. Ron Paul would basically do nothing even if he had solid, irrefutable proof of an Iranian nuclear bomb. Ron Paul’s foreign policy is not only offensive but dangerous.”
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... =3&theater
“Ron Paul “is living in the 20s,” and “thinks we can have a moat around the United States and if we ignore the world, the world will ignore us.” Ron Paul never speaks of America as being good but instead, he starts with a false premise – that the United States is a warmongering imperial power bent on conquest for fun and profit (that sounds the same as the Liberals say of America). Listening to Ron Paul, one gets the impression that all conservatives want to do is go to war for the sake of killing innocent people and building an American Empire. But he comes back and tells everyone he is the most conservative of all of the candidates but in fact his speeches are frequently littered with references to “empire” and imperial conquest.”
“The United States is a global superpower and that is a fact, whether Ron Paul and his supporters like it or not, and the United States has global responsibilities. Some of those responsibilities include use of the military. But how would he negotiate with a regime that has called for the extinction of the United States and America’s best ally in the Middle East? Would Ron Paul beg for our lives? Would Ron Paul promise tribute or land in exchange for peace? Appeasement like that has never worked, and it never will. He certainly would not negotiate from a position of strength, as he has repeatedly blamed America for the actions Iran has taken.”
“According to Ron Paul, anyone who wants to ensure a strong national defense in the face of stated threats is a “warmonger” and anyone concerned over Iran’s stated desire to acquire a nuclear device is engaging in “propaganda” for the sole purpose of going to war. Just look at the last few post of Greg. Ron Paul would basically do nothing even if he had solid, irrefutable proof of an Iranian nuclear bomb. Ron Paul’s foreign policy is not only offensive but dangerous.”
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... =3&theater
Re: Ron Paul not electable?
kill or be killed!
-
Greg_Cornish
- Posts: 5422
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:37 pm
- Location: Clear Lake
Re: Ron Paul not electable?
Face it Marty, he's much to honest and much to conservative for you. Your kind got us in this mess by interfering in other countries affair, conducting shady deals with foreign heads of state and oppressing their people and now the chickens came home to roost. You use, "Like it or not, we're a super power" as some sort of excuse to perpetuate it and expect that to make sense to people.
Well each year, more and more people aren't buying it. They see the Republican ultra conservatives sticking together like pack dogs and soon your bubble will burst and new parties will come about if the Democrats and Republicans don't stick them in prison and call them terrorists.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92OV3RbU3ek
Well each year, more and more people aren't buying it. They see the Republican ultra conservatives sticking together like pack dogs and soon your bubble will burst and new parties will come about if the Democrats and Republicans don't stick them in prison and call them terrorists.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92OV3RbU3ek
"The trouble with quotes on the Internet, is that you can never know if they are genuine." - Abraham Lincoln
Advertising
Copyright © 2013-2025 WesternBass.com ®