Okay, so now what if I said......

User avatar
g-man
Posts: 3210
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: Cooch's Dock "LL"

Re: Hey, speaking of screen names......

Post by g-man »

Mike wrote:
g-man wrote:Still laughing!!
Shut up Bones! :lol:
Your gonna start confusing people Mike! :lol:
100% LL
User avatar
Slippy
Posts: 843
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: L2W
Contact:

Re: Hey, speaking of screen names......

Post by Slippy »

speaking of Bones
LL
Kiss my Bass
Posts: 81
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:08 pm

Re: Hey, speaking of screen names......

Post by Kiss my Bass »

This is funny! :lol: :) :D :P :wink: :twisted:
fourbizzle
Posts: 142
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 7:41 pm
Location: Cool, CA

Re: WOW!

Post by fourbizzle »

bassindon69 wrote:MY GOD!! :roll: :roll: :roll: I hope another is banned soon.
no joke
User avatar
g-man
Posts: 3210
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: Cooch's Dock "LL"

Re: WOW!

Post by g-man »

fourbizzle wrote:
bassindon69 wrote:MY GOD!! :roll: :roll: :roll: I hope another is banned soon.
no joke
Ban who?
100% LL
User avatar
Brian
Posts: 2225
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 8:07 am

Re: WOW!

Post by Brian »

g-man wrote:
fourbizzle wrote:
bassindon69 wrote:MY GOD!! :roll: :roll: :roll: I hope another is banned soon.
no joke
Ban who?
You
[color=#0040FF]"Life's tough. It's even tougher if you're stupid."

-John Wayne[/color]
User avatar
DeltaDan
Posts: 2884
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:56 pm
Location: Oakley, CA
Contact:

Re: WOW!

Post by DeltaDan »

g-man wrote:
fourbizzle wrote:
bassindon69 wrote:MY GOD!! :roll: :roll: :roll: I hope another is banned soon.
no joke
Ban who?
Looks like BrothA Terry to me in reading this thread :shock: .......... bassindon and fourbizzle must not like the constant VROOOOOOOOOOMMMM and WHOOOOP WHOOOOOOOOOOOPPP. that Terry post........ :roll:



Anyone that would ever wish anyone to be banned from participating in a forum -- escecially when they adhere to all the rules of the forum is Image
You know, we always called each other goodfellas. Like, you'd say to somebody: "You're gonna like this guy; he's all right. He's a goodfella. He's one of us." You understand? We were goodfellas, wiseguys.

[b]Team LL [/b] (2006 ~ And Beyond !! )
User avatar
Terry Smith
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 6:08 am
Location: Wilton

Re: WOW!

Post by Terry Smith »

DeltaDan wrote:
g-man wrote:
fourbizzle wrote: no joke
Ban who?
Looks like BrothA Terry to me in reading this thread :shock: .......... bassindon and fourbizzle must not like the constant VROOOOOOOOOOMMMM and WHOOOOP WHOOOOOOOOOOOPPP. that Terry post........ :roll:



Anyone that would ever wish anyone to be banned from participating in a forum -- escecially when they adhere to all the rules of the forum is Image
EXCUSS ME!!! It's VVVAAARRRRRRRROOOOMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 and WHOMP WHOMP!!!!1 How did that go again Phil???WHOOMMP!!!!!!1 WHHHHOMP!!!1 WHHHHHOOOMMMPP!!!!!!1 BWWWWHAHAHHAHAHA FISH ON!!!!!!!!!! :P :lol:
http://www.basscat.com
http://www.tntbaits.com/
Lounge Lizard Extreme Bass Fishing
(916) 719-7225
User avatar
BassManDan
Posts: 1230
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 5:32 pm
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain

Re: Okay, so now what if I said......

Post by BassManDan »

Im sure this question has gotten a little convoluted since the beginning...
Fish Chris, I can totally agree with the basic tenents you have laid out. Lets just talk fish, cause frankly I know nothing about hunting!
As a GENERAL rule of thumb, harvesting "average" fish will have little to no affect on the population as a whole and often it will be a positive. Elimination of some competion from the grand scheme of things is often beneficial, and allows more fish to reach desireable sizes for our recreational fisheries.

"Average" is the word that can cause problems.
"Average" Delta bass ~2-3 lbs.
Average Shasta bass probly ~1 lb.
The descision needs to be made specifically on the body of water.
Smallmouth is real good eatin. Rarely that I do kill a bass (Heretic!!!) but I would keep a fish that is probly less than 2 lbs if the fish "average" about 2 lbs.

Also "selective" is the other important word. Take enough fish to feed yourself and another for the evening, maybe more if you don't fish all that often. Rarely does any of us see another angler leave with fish on a stringer and even more rare is an angler leaving with a limit of good sized fish. I think that is more so bred from the convention of catch and release, but I would like to see that really come from educated harvest practices, not just a 30 year old tradition.

I know there are alot of us that catch other fish for food as well, yet that same restraint of "selective harvest" is much less common when out fishing specifically to fill the freezer. Not to pick on any salmon anglers, but its too good of an example...Do you really need your two 35lb salmon, or could you do with a couple 20 lbers? I think it is practices like that which are ultimately the best action for preserving fish and fisheries.

Just my 2, but I hope at least a few folks agree with me!

BassManDan
BassManDan - 1997 Stratos 295 Pro Elite

"In the spirit of akido, sh-sh-sh-shaaa."
-Dale Gribble from TV's "King of the Hill"

"It would be the best of all possible worlds were it not for religion."
- John Adams, 1776
User avatar
Steve
Posts: 940
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Sacramento area

Hey Brian....

Post by Steve »

.... whats wrong with my shoes? I cant help it, Ive got hot feet!! LOL, this thread is funny! Ill send you a pair for X-mas, they may help you get out from behind your computer and go catch some donkeys.

Kiss My Bass, I remember now. I forgot for a second! Today was my first day in your neck of the woods. I got to screw around at Pardee and Comanche all day, I think Im gonna like it! TTYL.
User avatar
g-man
Posts: 3210
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: Cooch's Dock "LL"

Re: Hey Brian....

Post by g-man »

Damn its still here! lets keep it going 1000 bucks says I could whoop Slippy butt! lmfao!
100% LL
User avatar
bahlzar
Posts: 821
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:10 pm
Location: Lincoln Hillbilly

Re: Hey Brian....

Post by bahlzar »

who couldnt take slippy !!! thats like fightin a 13 year old girl
_______________________
User avatar
g-man
Posts: 3210
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: Cooch's Dock "LL"

Re: Hey Brian....

Post by g-man »

bahlzar wrote:who couldnt take slippy !!! thats like fightin a 13 year old girl
Lmfao! Hes hiding from the wrath!

Steve nice sandles! Bwaaaa!
100% LL
User avatar
Slippy
Posts: 843
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: L2W
Contact:

Re: Hey Brian....

Post by Slippy »

i would squish you like a bug G
LL
brambo0311
Posts: 1330
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 12:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Hey Brian....

Post by brambo0311 »

Come on g-man, Club him like a baby seal. :lol:
LL
User avatar
Slippy
Posts: 843
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: L2W
Contact:

Re: Hey Brian....

Post by Slippy »

yeah G bring it!
LL
User avatar
g-man
Posts: 3210
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: Cooch's Dock "LL"

Re: Hey Brian....

Post by g-man »

Slippy wrote:yeah G bring it!
wake up slippy, your dreaming again! lol Delta this weekend dude?
100% LL
User avatar
Slippy
Posts: 843
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: L2W
Contact:

Re: Hey Brian....

Post by Slippy »

yep, same bet?
LL
mac (Doyle McEwen)
Posts: 2755
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 9:39 am
Location: San Jose, CA

Re: Hey Brian....

Post by mac (Doyle McEwen) »

BassManDan, Your example of salmon may not be the best, if I am not mistaken, Pacific salmon die after they spawn, so we would lose that fish anyway out of the group..Now that being said, does a 35 pounder deposit more eggs than say a 20 pounder or if it were male would it fertilize more eggs prior to expiring..

According to the research I have done in the case of LMB, the larger older female bass do not lay as many eggs as a smaller female..Once they have reached 10 pounds or so, chances are they have already deposited more eggs than they will if they live another 10 years..Does this mean we should keep those that exceed 10 pounds over those that have yet reached their peak production years..I think not, as Chris has pointed out, by releasing them we give someone else the opportunity to catch that same fish again..This would not be the case with salmon, or rather Pacific salmon..

I definitely agree with you on your ideas about selective harvest for those that desire to do so..I do know that when I choose to keep a few for eating, I prefer those in the 1 1/2 to 2 pound category..Much nicer filets and much better tasting..It has been several years since I have had the urge to keep any though..As sportmen/women it is to our overall benefit to use the resource wisely..

mac
Take a kid fishing, and don't forget about us older kids either..
User avatar
Buzzbait
Posts: 209
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 9:28 am
Location: The pit of hell

Re: Yes I certainly agree with you Chris

Post by Buzzbait »

Jim Conlow Sr. wrote:Without the F&G there would no longer be any Fish and Game.
Best post on this whole thread.

Without the DF&G there wouldn't be anymore F&G period.
[img]http://a248.e.akamai.net/f/248/16813/7d/www.walmart.com/i/catalog/modules/G0040/walmart_logo2.gif[/img]
User avatar
DeltaDan
Posts: 2884
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:56 pm
Location: Oakley, CA
Contact:

Re: Yes I certainly agree with you Chris

Post by DeltaDan »

Buzzbait wrote: Without the DF&G there wouldn't be anymore F&G period.

IF the CA DFG were fully staffed and funded as any normal branch of Govt. Police Enforcement Agency..... along the the Courts - to fully prosecute the offenders to the fullest extent of the law..... There would be ALOT more F&G as well. :wink:
You know, we always called each other goodfellas. Like, you'd say to somebody: "You're gonna like this guy; he's all right. He's a goodfella. He's one of us." You understand? We were goodfellas, wiseguys.

[b]Team LL [/b] (2006 ~ And Beyond !! )
User avatar
DeltaDan
Posts: 2884
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:56 pm
Location: Oakley, CA
Contact:

Re: Yes I certainly agree with you Chris

Post by DeltaDan »

Will this "fine" fit the punishment ?


http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.c ... 002&sc=993

DFG busts bluegill, bass poachers
Tom Stienstra

Sunday, November 11, 2007

Fish and Game wardens have arrested four individuals on felony charges of illegally taking and selling sport fish in the Delta.

"Illegal take and sale of this valuable resource jeopardizes conservation efforts by the department and our partners," said DFG Patrol Chief Nancy Foley.

In the arrest sweep last week, wardens said they seized a 14-foot aluminum fishing boat, 36 bags of bluegill, each bag containing about 20 fish (more than 700 bluegill total), along with commercial quantities of individually packaged striped bass with weights marked on each package, and two scales used to weigh fish.

"This is another example of the Department of Fish and Game's ongoing effort to protect California's sport fish from illegal commercialization and poaching," said DFG Capt. Brian Naslund. During the past year, he said that the DFG has arrested other groups for the illegal commercialization of striped bass and sturgeon taken from the Delta.

According to the DFG, charged and arrested were: Tam Thi Dang, 46, of Sacramento; Dong Van Le, 48, of Sacramento; Thiet Van Nguyen, 50, of Stockton; and Nguyen Doan Thi Hui, 50, of Stockton. They face fines of up to $10,000 and up to one year in state prison or county jail.

- Tom Stienstra [/b]




Can you read into this ONE story of poachers cought -- "plea-bargen" -- off with a monetary fine and probation ?? :roll:


This is on the Courts side of enforcing the law .... And they are fully funded........ It is the jail space that is lacking there ~!! :evil:
You know, we always called each other goodfellas. Like, you'd say to somebody: "You're gonna like this guy; he's all right. He's a goodfella. He's one of us." You understand? We were goodfellas, wiseguys.

[b]Team LL [/b] (2006 ~ And Beyond !! )
Post Reply