California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over Shasta (McCLoud river project)

Post Reply
WB Staff
Posts: 12573
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 10:56 am

California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over Shasta (McCLoud river project)

Post by WB Staff »

California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over river project.png
The Trump administration and California officials have sued each other, swapped insults on Twitter and clashed on everything from climate change to immigration.

But threatening someone with jail time? That might be a new one.

The threats came in a dispute over reintroducing winter-run Chinook salmon into the McCloud River, a pristine river above Shasta Dam, as part of a federal plan approved under the Obama administration to try to stave off extinction for the critically endangered fish.

In preparation for the project, the California Department of Water Resources stockpiled netting, buoys and floating docks on a boat ramp controlled by the U.S. Forest Service at Shasta Lake, into which the McCloud flows.
More info : https://www.sacbee.com/news/california/ ... _Vs1SXh6cI
mark poulson
Posts: 10386
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 4:16 am
Location: Antioch, CA

Re: California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over Shasta (McCLoud river project)

Post by mark poulson »

WB Staff wrote:California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over river project.png

The Trump administration and California officials have sued each other, swapped insults on Twitter and clashed on everything from climate change to immigration.

But threatening someone with jail time? That might be a new one.

The threats came in a dispute over reintroducing winter-run Chinook salmon into the McCloud River, a pristine river above Shasta Dam, as part of a federal plan approved under the Obama administration to try to stave off extinction for the critically endangered fish.

In preparation for the project, the California Department of Water Resources stockpiled netting, buoys and floating docks on a boat ramp controlled by the U.S. Forest Service at Shasta Lake, into which the McCloud flows.
More info : https://www.sacbee.com/news/california/ ... _Vs1SXh6cI
This sucks, bigtime.
Attitude plus effort equal success
CLEAN AND DRY
User avatar
Steve
Posts: 935
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Sacramento area

Re: California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over Shasta (McCLoud river project)

Post by Steve »

Mark, what would be the benefit of stocking Sacramento River Winter-run Chinook above Shasta Dam?
Chad Sweitzer
Posts: 189
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 4:49 pm

Re: California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over Shasta (McCLoud river project)

Post by Chad Sweitzer »

If these fish can swim into Shasta I'm all for it. Those spots will feed on the salmon if they stock them small enough.
PB: Spot-9.625 (Shasta Record) LMB-13.27 SM-4.36
mark poulson
Posts: 10386
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 4:16 am
Location: Antioch, CA

Re: California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over Shasta (McCLoud river project)

Post by mark poulson »

Steve wrote:Mark, what would be the benefit of stocking Sacramento River Winter-run Chinook above Shasta Dam?
"The threats came in a dispute over reintroducing winter-run Chinook salmon into the McCloud River, a pristine river above Shasta Dam, as part of a federal plan approved under the Obama administration to try to stave off extinction for the critically endangered fish."
They're trying to save salmon that have been devastated by pumping water out of the Delta.
Attitude plus effort equal success
CLEAN AND DRY
User avatar
Steve
Posts: 935
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Sacramento area

Re: California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over Shasta (McCLoud river project)

Post by Steve »

Mark:

The Sacramento River Winter-run Chinook Salmon ESU is anadromous. Fish reintroduced above Shasta dam, or any dam for that matter, would not contribute to the anadromous population. So Im just wondering how this reintroduction would contribute to the population and help save the ESU?
mark poulson
Posts: 10386
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 4:16 am
Location: Antioch, CA

Re: California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over Shasta (McCLoud river project)

Post by mark poulson »

Steve wrote:Mark:

The Sacramento River Winter-run Chinook Salmon ESU is anadromous. Fish reintroduced above Shasta dam, or any dam for that matter, would not contribute to the anadromous population. So Im just wondering how this reintroduction would contribute to the population and help save the ESU?
I know you're right, but maybe it can help them tread water until they stop draining the Delta.
Attitude plus effort equal success
CLEAN AND DRY
User avatar
ash
SpeedBump
Posts: 4930
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 9:07 am
Location: DirtyD
Contact:

Re: California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over Shasta (McCLoud river project)

Post by ash »

Chad Sweitzer wrote:If these fish can swim into Shasta I'm all for it. Those spots will feed on the salmon if they stock them small enough.
Chad if this is the case the Spotted Bass will be put on the kill list as they are non native fish killing native endangered species
- JaJa Jigs - Get THUNKED
Links to Check Out -
https://www.instagram.com/jm_ash/
https://www.bestbasstournaments.com/
User avatar
Steve
Posts: 935
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Sacramento area

Re: California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over Shasta (McCLoud river project)

Post by Steve »

Technically Ash the reintroduced fish would not be part of the protected population, and I believe that humans would be allowed to catch and eat them as well.

I suppose the only benefit to these reintroduction's above a migration barrier is to preserve the gene pool for future management efforts. Regardless, these operations are very costly and Ive always felt that the money would be more beneficial to the population by investing it in habitat restoration efforts within the species anadromous waters. Just look at how successful the habitat restorations have been for Winter-run below Keswick Dam. More return for your money IMO.
steve0806
Posts: 202
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 1:33 pm

Re: California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over Shasta (McCLoud river project)

Post by steve0806 »

WB Staff wrote:California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over river project.png

The Trump administration and California officials have sued each other, swapped insults on Twitter and clashed on everything from climate change to immigration.

But threatening someone with jail time? That might be a new one.

The threats came in a dispute over reintroducing winter-run Chinook salmon into the McCloud River, a pristine river above Shasta Dam, as part of a federal plan approved under the Obama administration to try to stave off extinction for the critically endangered fish.

In preparation for the project, the California Department of Water Resources stockpiled netting, buoys and floating docks on a boat ramp controlled by the U.S. Forest Service at Shasta Lake, into which the McCloud flows.
More info : https://www.sacbee.com/news/california/ ... _Vs1SXh6cI
steve0806
Posts: 202
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 1:33 pm

Re: California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over Shasta (McCLoud river project)

Post by steve0806 »

Shame on you, WB Staff! Your headline is way out of bounds. Read the Fed cease and desist letter. It properly quotes what is in the regulation.
Rod Martin
Posts: 2819
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 6:31 pm
Location: Holiday,Fl.

Re: California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over Shasta (McCLoud river project)

Post by Rod Martin »

Did anybody read the article.

I got water below the dam is too hot fish cannot breed so stocked above dam then recaught moved below the dam to go on their merry way.

Where does it say anything about pumping in the Delta is the reason seems it is temp of the water below the dam
TR177 Ranger/ Mercury/Lowrance/ Ghost TM
WB Staff
Posts: 12573
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 10:56 am

Re: California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over Shasta (McCLoud river project)

Post by WB Staff »

@steve

WB didn't write the title... it is from the Sac Bee. We only shared their article as noted in the credit at the link.
WB takes no credit for the info. WB is sharing info that is available for discussion on our fisheries.
Rod Martin
Posts: 2819
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 6:31 pm
Location: Holiday,Fl.

Re: California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over Shasta (McCLoud river project)

Post by Rod Martin »

I think it must have been a liberal newspaper that came up with that headline.

Anytime a gov. agency sends out something like that it has that kind of language in it. So another blown out headline


But it sure looks good :lol:
TR177 Ranger/ Mercury/Lowrance/ Ghost TM
mark poulson
Posts: 10386
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 4:16 am
Location: Antioch, CA

Re: California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over Shasta (McCLoud river project)

Post by mark poulson »

Rod Martin wrote:I think it must have been a liberal newspaper that came up with that headline.

Anytime a gov. agency sends out something like that it has that kind of language in it. So another blown out headline


But it sure looks good :lol:
But it is still worrisome. To me, it is a reminder of just how much power, for good or for bad, the Federal Government has.
Attitude plus effort equal success
CLEAN AND DRY
Rod Martin
Posts: 2819
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 6:31 pm
Location: Holiday,Fl.

Re: California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over Shasta (McCLoud river project)

Post by Rod Martin »

mark poulson wrote:
Rod Martin wrote:I think it must have been a liberal newspaper that came up with that headline.

Anytime a gov. agency sends out something like that it has that kind of language in it. So another blown out headline


But it sure looks good :lol:
But it is still worrisome. To me, it is a reminder of just how much power, for good or for bad, the Federal Government has.

I agree, in the beginning I think there were 4 departments in the federal gov. and it was the federal gov's job to defend our borders and a few other things.

I could live with that. Get out of water (unless it is a border between states) get out of land, give it all back to the states whose borders it is in.
and most important do not duplicate any state agency . Then if a state screws the pooch don't give them any aid


Have a nice weekend
TR177 Ranger/ Mercury/Lowrance/ Ghost TM
mark poulson
Posts: 10386
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 4:16 am
Location: Antioch, CA

Re: California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over Shasta (McCLoud river project)

Post by mark poulson »

Rod Martin wrote:
mark poulson wrote:
Rod Martin wrote:I think it must have been a liberal newspaper that came up with that headline.

Anytime a gov. agency sends out something like that it has that kind of language in it. So another blown out headline


But it sure looks good :lol:
But it is still worrisome. To me, it is a reminder of just how much power, for good or for bad, the Federal Government has.

I agree, in the beginning I think there were 4 departments in the federal gov. and it was the federal gov's job to defend our borders and a few other things.

I could live with that. Get out of water (unless it is a border between states) get out of land, give it all back to the states whose borders it is in.
and most important do not duplicate any state agency . Then if a state screws the pooch don't give them any aid


Have a nice weekend
First and foremost, the Federal Government is supposed to uphold and defend the Constitution.
Attitude plus effort equal success
CLEAN AND DRY
Rod Martin
Posts: 2819
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 6:31 pm
Location: Holiday,Fl.

Re: California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over Shasta (McCLoud river project)

Post by Rod Martin »

mark poulson wrote:
Rod Martin wrote:
mark poulson wrote: But it is still worrisome. To me, it is a reminder of just how much power, for good or for bad, the Federal Government has.

I agree, in the beginning I think there were 4 departments in the federal gov. and it was the federal gov's job to defend our borders and a few other things.

I could live with that. Get out of water (unless it is a border between states) get out of land, give it all back to the states whose borders it is in.
and most important do not duplicate any state agency . Then if a state screws the pooch don't give them any aid


Have a nice weekend
First and foremost, the Federal Government is supposed to uphold and defend the Constitution.

Sorry Mark, I thought that was a given but yes defend the Constitution as it was written. I'm not much on liberal interpretation and I'm not much on adding to the Federal Gov. I am a firm believer in states rights
TR177 Ranger/ Mercury/Lowrance/ Ghost TM
WRB
Posts: 1083
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 8:47 pm
Location: Simi Valley

Re: California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over Shasta (McCLoud river project)

Post by WRB »

Moving back to the topic of capturing adult king salmon and transporting them to the McCloud River so the salmon can spawn followed a year later by recapturing young King salmon migrating down into lake Shasta at the confluence of the McCloud River entering the McCloud rive arm seems on it's face feasible.
What could go wrong? The adult King salmon are big fish and die after spawning. Without a population of bears and Eagles to eat the dead salmon they float back down the McCloud attracting gulls that also eat the salmon smelt. Hoping the salmon smelt stay in the McCloud before growing to recapture size isn't known. The thermal shock of capturing any fish from very cold water of the McCloud and transporting to the Sacramento River below the dam will result in high mortality rates. The salmon must be conditioned slowly to water temperature changes that occur naturally when migration down free running rivers to the ocean.
It's a feel good plan without considering all the factors. First and foremost the removal of Sea Lions from the Bay Area before providing them another food source.
Tom
Rod Martin
Posts: 2819
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 6:31 pm
Location: Holiday,Fl.

Re: California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over Shasta (McCLoud river project)

Post by Rod Martin »

WRB wrote:Moving back to the topic of capturing adult king salmon and transporting them to the McCloud River so the salmon can spawn followed a year later by recapturing young King salmon migrating down into lake Shasta at the confluence of the McCloud River entering the McCloud rive arm seems on it's face feasible.
What could go wrong? The adult King salmon are big fish and die after spawning. Without a population of bears and Eagles to eat the dead salmon they float back down the McCloud attracting gulls that also eat the salmon smelt. Hoping the salmon smelt stay in the McCloud before growing to recapture size isn't known. The thermal shock of capturing any fish from very cold water of the McCloud and transporting to the Sacramento River below the dam will result in high mortality rates. The salmon must be conditioned slowly to water temperature changes that occur naturally when migration down free running rivers to the ocean.
It's a feel good plan without considering all the factors. First and foremost the removal of Sea Lions from the Bay Area before providing them another food source.
Tom

California officials threatened with jail byTrump admin over river project.png

Nobody reads the article, It was about Trump admin threating California officials with jail.


It said so in the headline.

Then it had some story of YOUNG Fish from a hatchery planted above a dam until they grew up and were ready to migrate to the ocean. At that time they would be recaught and taken below the dam to swim out to sea.

So it was really about Trump being mean. Show me where I'm wrong

Thank you
TR177 Ranger/ Mercury/Lowrance/ Ghost TM
Post Reply